How is the balance of power supposed to work when a U.S. President aggressively pushes for more? In his first 100 days of his second term, President Donald Trump issued more executive orders than any president in history, and the Supreme Court has largely let them stand while legal challenges play out. Whether that troubles you depends largely on how you feel about the President and his policies. But within four years, someone else will hold that office and may wield the same power toward different priorities. In this episode of Top of Mind, host Julie Rose explores the origins of “checks and balances” in American government, including the surprising history of how the Supreme Court became “supreme.” We hear from a conservative legal scholar who worked for the George W. Bush Administration and thinks America benefits when Presidents push the limits of their power and Congress pushes back. Then we’ll explore why some Americans believe their local “Constitutional Sheriff”—not federal officials—is the ultimate authority in their community. GUESTS Timothy Johnson, Professor of Political Science and Law, University of Minnesota (https://www.trjumn.com/) John Yoo, Professor of Law, UC Berkeley; Distinguished Fellow, Civitas Institute at the University of Texas at Austin (https://www.law.berkeley.edu/our-faculty/faculty-profiles/john-yoo/) Richard Mack, Former Sheriff of Graham County, Arizona; Founder of the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association (https://cspoa.org/) CHAPTERS 0:00 Introduction 3:00 Chapter 1 — Who Made the Supreme Court Supreme? (Timothy Johnson) 18:00 Chapter 2 — How Strong is Too Strong? (John Yoo) 36:00 Chapter 3 — "The Constitution is King" (Richard Mack) 53:00 Conclusion

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.

Transcript

Related