Original post: https://yoonjiwon.substack.com/p/hongik-ingan-korean-democracyAn origin myth that starts with helping—not conquering—became Korea’s moral operating system, shaping democracy, classrooms, and how the country shows up in the world.What this episode is about: We trace Hongik Ingan—“to broadly benefit humankind”—from the Dangun myth to the independence movement (Jo So-ang’s Samgyunjuui, Kim Gu’s cultural ideal), into education law (Education Basic Act, Article 2), and out to lived practice: Saemaul Undong, the IMF Gold Collection Campaign, COVID-19 collective action, and KOICA’s co-prosperity approach abroad.We sit with the tension: high ideals vs. high-pressure schooling, and how an ethic for “all” avoids becoming coercive.Why it mattersA non-Western frame for democratic purpose: benefit broadly, not just win narrowly.A practical lens for AI ethics, climate, and inequality: Who broadly benefits?A decoder for Korea’s soft power—stories of relationship, responsibility, and community.Key terms (quick glossary)Hongik Ingan (홍익인간): to broadly benefit humankind.Ihwasegye (이화세계): ordering/transforming the world by principle—how to realize Hongik Ingan.Samgyunjuui (삼균주의): Jo So-ang’s “three equalities” (political, economic, educational) as institutional design.Dure spirit (두레정신): traditional community cooperation; backbone of Saemaul Undong.KOICA / co-prosperity: Korea’s positive-sum, partner-first development framing.Pull quotes“Korea’s origin story doesn’t begin with conquest; it begins with a service project.”“People power in Korea didn’t just topple dictators—it held presidents to account.”“Not charity—design. That’s what co-prosperity looks like.”Full essay + images: Original post on Substack → https://yoonjiwon.substack.com/p/hongik-ingan-korean-democracy Get full access to Understanding Korea, One Story at a Time at yoonjiwon.substack.com/subscribe

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.

Transcript

Related