Building Blocks: Hill v Tupper [1863]

episode

Unpacking the Case - Real Estate Law Podcast not yet transcribed

▲ 0

Transcript

This episode hasn't been transcribed yet Upvotes decide what gets transcribed next — 0 so far. Sign in to upvote

More from Unpacking the Case - Real Estate Law Podcast

Licence to Thrill (Property Lawyers): EE and H3G v AP Wireless II 13 min · 22 Jul 2026

Up, Down and All Around: Your UORR Questions Answered 21 min · 16 Jul 2026

Finders Keepers? The Adverse Possession Q&A 16 min · 13 Jul 2026

Can Fire Safety Frustrate a Commercial Lease? Into Nominee 1 v Study Group 14 min · 06 Jul 2026

The Building Safety Act Blind Spot: Essendi Hotels v London Property Group 10 min · 02 Jul 2026

Behind the Bar: Star Pubs v Gunmakers Arms 9 min · 03 Jun 2026

All episodes from Unpacking the Case - Real Estate Law Podcast →

Report any issue

Source

Recorded29 Mar 2022

Publisherrss.buzzsprout.com

Handlerec:9304209

Show notes

In this Building Blocks episode, Richard discusses the characteristics, and the requirements to qualify as an easement with regards to Hill v Tupper. Hill was granted exclusive and contractual rights to run pleasure boats along a canal, but Tupper was also running boats along the same stretch of canal; albeit for the purpose of allowing people to fish and bathe in it. Hill objected to this. However, it was asserted that easements must be for the benefit for the dominant land, and so Richard describes the implications and outcome of the case with regards to this. #realestate #law #land #environment Get in touch!

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.

Sign in