When Use Becomes Ownership: Kirkman v Bradshaw Pub Company Ltd

episode

Previously titled “*NEWSFLASH* Kirkman v Bradshaw Pub Company Limited” — renamed by the publisher on Aug 3, 2026

Unpacking the Case - Real Estate Law Podcast not yet transcribed

▲ 0

Transcript

This episode hasn't been transcribed yet Upvotes decide what gets transcribed next — 0 so far. Sign in to upvote

More from Unpacking the Case - Real Estate Law Podcast

Licence to Thrill (Property Lawyers): EE and H3G v AP Wireless II 13 min · 22 Jul 2026

Up, Down and All Around: Your UORR Questions Answered 21 min · 16 Jul 2026

Finders Keepers? The Adverse Possession Q&A 16 min · 13 Jul 2026

Can Fire Safety Frustrate a Commercial Lease? Into Nominee 1 v Study Group 14 min · 06 Jul 2026

The Building Safety Act Blind Spot: Essendi Hotels v London Property Group 10 min · 02 Jul 2026

Behind the Bar: Star Pubs v Gunmakers Arms 9 min · 03 Jun 2026

All episodes from Unpacking the Case - Real Estate Law Podcast →

Report any issue

Source

Recorded11 Apr 2025

Publisherrss.buzzsprout.com

Handlerec:9304132

Show notes

In this Newsflash episode, Lizzie Collin sits down with Richard Snape, Head of Legal Training at Davitt Jones Bould, to discuss the law of adverse possession through the lens of the Kirkman v Bradshaw Pub Company Limited case. Together, they break down the facts, explore what constitutes factual possession and intention to possess, and reflect on why the absence of fencing didn’t defeat the claim. This podcast is for informational purposes only and is not intended to provide legal or professional advice. No liability is accepted by Davitt Jones Bould for any reliance placed on its content.#AdversePossession #DavittJonesBouldGet in touch!

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.

Sign in