In this Newsflash episode, Lizzie Collin sits down with Richard Snape, Davitt Jones Bould's Head of Legal Training, and Property Litigation Partner Jonathan Warner-Reed to discuss Mackenzie v Cheung and Infinity. Jonathan provides insights into the recent Court of Appeal case where he represented the successful respondent. Richard and Jonathan analyse the interpretation of property covenants, and grants of modification. This case holds relevance for stakeholders involved in developments of any size. They assess the background to the case, reminding us of the importance of planning permission when it comes to restrictive covenants. Additionally, Richard and Jonathan elaborate on the reasoning behind the decision, addressing the impact on conveyancers. Cases mentioned:Mackenzie vs Cheung & Infinity [2024]Mayner v Payne [1914]Eagling v Gardner [1970]Get in touch!

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.