NEWSFLASH McDonald’s Restaurants v Shirayama Shokusan

episode

Unpacking the Case - Real Estate Law Podcast not yet transcribed

▲ 0

Transcript

This episode hasn't been transcribed yet Upvotes decide what gets transcribed next — 0 so far. Sign in to upvote

More from Unpacking the Case - Real Estate Law Podcast

Licence to Thrill (Property Lawyers): EE and H3G v AP Wireless II 13 min · 22 Jul 2026

Up, Down and All Around: Your UORR Questions Answered 21 min · 16 Jul 2026

Finders Keepers? The Adverse Possession Q&A 16 min · 13 Jul 2026

Can Fire Safety Frustrate a Commercial Lease? Into Nominee 1 v Study Group 14 min · 06 Jul 2026

The Building Safety Act Blind Spot: Essendi Hotels v London Property Group 10 min · 02 Jul 2026

Behind the Bar: Star Pubs v Gunmakers Arms 9 min · 03 Jun 2026

All episodes from Unpacking the Case - Real Estate Law Podcast →

Report any issue

Source

Recorded02 Jul 2024

Publisherrss.buzzsprout.com

Handlerec:9304160

Show notes

In this Newsflash episode, Lizzie Collin sits down with Richard Snape, Head of Legal Training at Davitt Jones Bould to discuss the recent High Court case, McDonald’s Restaurants v Shirayama Shokusan. The case is in relation to the rarely discussed topic of a landlord obtaining possession through misrepresentation. Richard provides an in-depth analysis of the case's background and evaluates the potential implications arising from one of the few decisions on section 37A of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954. Cases mentioned:McDonald’s Restaurants v Shirayama Shokusan [2024]Eco3 Capital Ltd & Ors v Ludsin Overseas Ltd (2013)Get in touch!

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.

Sign in