NEWSFLASH TFS Stores v Designer Retail Outlet Centres

episode

Unpacking the Case - Real Estate Law Podcast not yet transcribed

▲ 0

Transcript

This episode hasn't been transcribed yet Upvotes decide what gets transcribed next — 0 so far. Sign in to upvote

More from Unpacking the Case - Real Estate Law Podcast

Licence to Thrill (Property Lawyers): EE and H3G v AP Wireless II 13 min · 22 Jul 2026

Up, Down and All Around: Your UORR Questions Answered 21 min · 16 Jul 2026

Finders Keepers? The Adverse Possession Q&A 16 min · 13 Jul 2026

Can Fire Safety Frustrate a Commercial Lease? Into Nominee 1 v Study Group 14 min · 06 Jul 2026

The Building Safety Act Blind Spot: Essendi Hotels v London Property Group 10 min · 02 Jul 2026

Behind the Bar: Star Pubs v Gunmakers Arms 9 min · 03 Jun 2026

All episodes from Unpacking the Case - Real Estate Law Podcast →

Report any issue

Source

Recorded25 May 2021

Publisherrss.buzzsprout.com

Handlerec:9304247

Show notes

In this episode, Richard covers the 1954 Landlord and Tenant Act in relation to the recent TFS Stores v Designer Retail Outlet Centres case. TFS Stores (the tenant) argued that Designer Retail Outlet Centres (the Landlord) did not validly contract out their leases based on the 1954 Landlord & Tenant Act. This is because the commencement date of the lease was not accurately recorded on any of the leases, but rather using terms such as “a date to be agreed”. Listen to the episode to find out what was the Court of Appeal. #realestate #law #landlord #lease Get in touch!

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.

Sign in