NEWSFLASH W(No.3) GP (Nominee A) v JD Sports Fashion

episode

Unpacking the Case - Real Estate Law Podcast not yet transcribed

▲ 0

Transcript

This episode hasn't been transcribed yet Upvotes decide what gets transcribed next — 0 so far. Sign in to upvote

More from Unpacking the Case - Real Estate Law Podcast

Licence to Thrill (Property Lawyers): EE and H3G v AP Wireless II 13 min · 22 Jul 2026

Up, Down and All Around: Your UORR Questions Answered 21 min · 16 Jul 2026

Finders Keepers? The Adverse Possession Q&A 16 min · 13 Jul 2026

Can Fire Safety Frustrate a Commercial Lease? Into Nominee 1 v Study Group 14 min · 06 Jul 2026

The Building Safety Act Blind Spot: Essendi Hotels v London Property Group 10 min · 02 Jul 2026

Behind the Bar: Star Pubs v Gunmakers Arms 9 min · 03 Jun 2026

All episodes from Unpacking the Case - Real Estate Law Podcast →

Report any issue

Source

Recorded26 Jan 2022

Publisherrss.buzzsprout.com

Handlerec:9304223

Show notes

Richard discusses the recent case transcripts from the October 22nd County Court case, W(No.3) GP (Nominee A) v JD Sports Fashion. Whilst it does not set a precedent, it is a topical case, particularly for valuers. The main area of contention being turnover rents, Richard discusses the steps taken in agreeing the new rent as in default of agreement between the parties, you should have regard to the terms of the tenancy other than those relating to rent, and find out what the holding may reasonably be expected to be let on in the open market. #realestate #law #rent #litigation Get in touch!

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.

Sign in