In this episode of Unpacking the Case, we examine the Upper Tribunal's decision in Notting Hill Home Ownership Ltd v Samoail and Others [2026] UKUT 235 (LC), a significant ruling for landlords, housing associations and shared ownership providers.The Tribunal confirmed that shared ownership leaseholders cannot be required to pay service charges for parts of an estate that fall outside the scope of their sub-lease and which they are unable to access. The decision dismissed appeals brought by Notting Hill Genesis and followed disputes involving substantial service charge demands, with some residents facing bills of more than £6,000 to contribute towards maintenance.We explore why the wording of leases remains crucial, and the wider implications for service charge recovery, estate management and shared ownership developments across England and Wales.Whether you advise landlords, manage residential developments or work in the affordable housing sector, this episode highlights an important reminder that service charge obligations must be rooted firmly in the rights and responsibilities set out in the lease.Relevant Cases:Chartbrook Ltd v Persimmon Homes Ltd [2009]Get in touch! Training & Free Webinars for Property Professionals:Would you like to keep up to date with the latest in real estate law? Davitt Jones Bould offers legal training tailored to your organisation’s needs, delivered in person across the UK or remotely. We also run free monthly webinars through for surveyors, solicitors, and property professionals across sectors. To sign up or learn more, visit our events page here or email [email protected] for information and booking. This podcast is for informational purposes only and is not intended to provide legal or professional advice. No liability is accepted by Davitt Jones Bould for any reliance placed on its content. Get in touch!

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.