Where exactly is the boundary between neighbouring properties, and can an informal agreement between neighbours settle the issue? In this episode of Unpacking the Case, we explore Todd v Marsh [2026] EWHC 1701 (Ch), a decision that attracted national attention and provides valuable insight into how boundary disputes are approached by the courts. The case centres around a dog and deer proof fence that was moved by the neighbours. In reaching its decision, the Court considered a range of important authorities spanning more than 250 years, including Penn v Lord Baltimore (1750), Neilson v Poole (1969), Gibson v New (2021), White v Alder (2025) and Bishop v Jacques (2025). Our Head of Legal Training Richard Snape looks at what these cases tell us about informal boundary agreements and certainty of ownership.This episode offers insight into an area of property law where a few inches of land can lead to years of litigation. Relevant Cases:White v Alder [2025]Bishop v Jacques [2025]Penn v Lord Baltimore (1750)Neilson v Poole [1969]Gibson v New [2021]Get in touch! Training & Free Webinars for Property Professionals:Would you like to keep up to date with the latest in real estate law? Davitt Jones Bould offers legal training tailored to your organisation’s needs, delivered in person across the UK or remotely. We also run free monthly webinars through for surveyors, solicitors, and property professionals across sectors. To sign up or learn more, visit our events page here or email [email protected] for information and booking. This podcast is for informational purposes only and is not intended to provide legal or professional advice. No liability is accepted by Davitt Jones Bould for any reliance placed on its content. Get in touch!

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.