Quiet enjoyment is one of the most quoted rights in property law, but what happens when a landlord needs vacant possession to carry out urgent structural repairs?In this episode of Unpacking the Case, we explore the High Court decision in MSA Properties Ltd v The Drapery Northampton Ltd [2026] EWHC 1420 (KB), a case that tested the balance between a landlord's repairing obligations and a tenant's right to quiet enjoyment.Following the collapse of a ground floor ceiling, investigations revealed severely rotten floor joists caused by historic water ingress. To complete the necessary repairs, the landlord required occupants of the first-floor flats to move out temporarily. The tenant argued that this interfered with their right to quiet enjoyment and sought compensation for lost rental income. The High Court confirmed that neither a landlord's duty to repair nor a tenant's right to quiet enjoyment automatically takes priority. Instead, the two obligations must be carefully balanced in the circumstances of each case. The court also dismissed the tenant's claim for loss of rent due to a lack of supporting evidence.Join us as we unpack what this judgment means for landlords, tenants, property managers and real estate professionals dealing with repair obligations, access rights and tenant disruption. Relevant cases: Goldmile Properties Ltd v Lechouritis [2003]Century Projects Limited v Almacantar (Centre Point) Limited [2014]Almacantar Centre Point Nominee No.1 Ltd & Ors v Penelope de Valk & Ors [2025]Timothy Taylor Ltd v Mayfair House Corp [2016]Get in touch! Training & Free Webinars for Property Professionals:Would you like to keep up to date with the latest in real estate law? Davitt Jones Bould offers legal training tailored to your organisation’s needs, delivered in person across the UK or remotely. We also run free monthly webinars through for surveyors, solicitors, and property professionals across sectors. To sign up or learn more, visit our events page here or email [email protected] for information and booking. This podcast is for informational purposes only and is not intended to provide legal or professional advice. No liability is accepted by Davitt Jones Bould for any reliance placed on its content. Get in touch!

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.