Catch up on this week’s key UPC rulings as our AI hosts unpack Professor Willem Hoyng’s expert analysis of the decisions from Week 42, 2025.Highlights include:Enforcement & Penalties (CoA): A deep dive into the Court of Appeal's "must-read" decision in Kodak v FUJIFILM , which laid out a clear framework for dealing with penalty orders and other crucial enforcement issues.Long-Arm Jurisdiction, Validity & Infringement (The Hague LD): Analysis of the ruling in HL Display v Black Sheep, where the court found the patent valid and infringed , and confirmed its jurisdiction to rule over a Dutch defendant for infringements in all countries where the patent has been validated.Valid but Not Infringed (Düsseldorf LD): A look at the decision in Hartman v Omni-Pac, where the court upheld a patent in amended form but found no infringement (either literally or by equivalence). Late equivalence arguments were not admitted.For the Full Week 42 analysis by Professor Hoyng, visit:👉 https://www.hoyngrokhmonegier.com/news-insights/upc-unfiltered-by-willem-hoyng-upc-decisions-week-42-2025/Disclaimer: Podcast uses AI-generated voices – minor inaccuracies may occur.

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.

Transcript

Related