In this episode (Week 44, 2025), our AI hosts unpack Professor Willem Hoyng’s expert analysis of the latest key UPC rulings.Highlights from this episode include:🔹 Res Judicata from National Courts (LD Munich): In Heraeus v Vibrantz, the UPC respected a German court’s decision as res iudicata, but still allowed a new invalidity argument (Art. 83 EPC) that wasn't raised nationally.🔹 Security for Costs on Appeal (Court of Appeal): A key ruling in Oerlikon v Bhagat. The CoA denied security for first instance costs but granted it for the appeal itself, citing the appellant's refusal to pay.🔹 "Useless" PI against non-appearing defendants? (LD Düsseldorf): In HP v Rentmeister, a PI was granted, but Willem Hoyng questions its value since no ruling was given against the Chinese defendant. He argues Art. 15 of The Hague Convention was overlooked.📖 For the full in-depth written analysis by Prof. Hoyng, click here:https://www.hoyngrokhmonegier.com/news-insights/upc-unfiltered-by-willem-hoyng-upc-decisions-week-44-2025/(Disclaimer: This podcast uses AI-generated voices—minor inaccuracies may occur.)#UPCUnfiltered #UnifiedPatent-Court #PatentLitigation #UPC #CaseLaw #WillemHoyng #LegalTech #PatentLaw #ResJudicata #SecurityForCosts

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.

Transcript

Related