Aaron Siri
speaker
358 appearances
2 recordings
2 series
first heard Nov 2024
last heard Dec 2024
Aaron Siri’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.
Trend
recordings per month · last 12 monthsNo recordings in the last 12 months.Older appearances are listed below; set an alert to hear about the next one.
Appearances
and often underpowered, meaning you don't have enough kids in it to really assess if there's even an issue. So why would Pfizer have multi-year placebo-controlled trial for its drugs, but all these vaccines are put out with just ridiculous, like this polio vaccine we talked about, okay? It's because Pfizer wants to know whether or not those drugs are gonna cause harm after they're licensed.
Because if it does, they're on the hook. They don't want to end up upside down financially. They don't want to lose money on those drugs. So before it goes on the market, they make sure they want those trials. You asked me before about the FDA. Forget the FDA. That's what economic interest does. It conforms the conduct of the company to assure safety, and that's a great thing.
That's part of why our market system works well with regards to product safety. People talk about the lawsuits.
yeah the lawsuits are there but it's not the lawsuits that make them safe it's the fact that they want to make money and most of safety happens before the lawsuit it happens before the product even goes to market the company cares they test it they evaluate it they don't want to face the liability and be upside down but when it comes to vaccines they don't have that interest when you look at most lawsuits that big companies face the board members face the officers face oftentimes because they cause a financial loss right
You ever hear of a lawsuit of securities class action because a company was immoral, was unethical? No, it's because they lost money. It's because they didn't do things to maximize money in many ways. And so that's what conforms. That's what drives corporate conduct, drives the companies to make decisions about what they're going to do. And you have a company that's making a product.
When they make the drug, their fiduciary duty to their shareholders is to make sure they test that properly. but their fiduciary duty to their shareholders when it comes to the vaccines is to test them as little as possible. Because if they do test them and they find a problem, then they can't make money from it. They might not get to market.
They would actually be kind of in some ways, forget ethics and morality, they would in many ways violate their fiduciary duty to their shareholders to test the vaccine too much. If they know too much. If they know too much, then it won't get licensed. It's a perversion of it. And then after, so not only do they gut
Not only did they gut the economic interest, there is one other way you assure product safety. It's a far weaker way. It's not very good, but it's there. And that's regulators. And they have a role to play. They have a role to play.
But the regulators here are completely conflicted because HHS, the Department of Health and Human Services, is the department of the federal government in which you have the CDC, the FDA, the NIH, all of the health agencies, okay? And it is responsible for promoting vaccines. So it's responsible for the safety of vaccines and promoting vaccines. Those are in conflict. For example. You think?
For example, the Department of Transportation is responsible for promoting transportation. So they go to the airlines and they say, hey, make more planes, get more planes in the sky, have more airports, you know, and so forth. But who's responsible for safety if there's a crash? The NTSB, a completely different agency. You separate them. It's hard for me to shake your hand with industry.
I'm the government. I say, hey, make more planes. And at the same time, slap you and say, hey, it's hard to do the same role. So you separate. Or the Department of Energy is responsible for promoting nuclear power in America. But there's an atomic energy, the nuclear regulatory agency, excuse me, yeah, thank you, is responsible for the safety of nuclear power plants.
They completely separate this function with vaccines. They're not separated. And additionally, not only do they not separate those absolutely diametrically opposed duties, you cannot have the same department responsible for both. One will win out. More than that, remember what I told you earlier.
The 1986 act that I referenced did create a very narrow path for some compensation if you're vaccine injured. But you sue the Department of Health and Human Services, the secretary. You are suing the very same federal health department that is responsible for safety. So if, and they're represented by a little law firm called the Department of Justice. You might've heard of them, okay?
So you're fighting against the Department of Justice in this program where there's no discovery. Let's put that aside. The important point is this. It is the only product that I know of where the government defends the product and the industry and the companies against the consumer and the citizens. And that creates an incredible conflict. So if they do any study, Tucker, think about it.
If they do a study that shows this vaccine causes asthma or causes an increase in some serious issue, what are the few lawyers that engage with vaccine injury in this program gonna do? Is an admission against interest. They're going to use those studies, those science to get liability against who? The federal government for those vaccine injuries. It's an incredible conflict.
So there is a tax, 75 cents is paid for every vaccine dose. And that goes into a fund. That fund has about $3 billion right now. It's paid out, I think over 4 billion to date with a cap of 250,000 in pain and suffering. and a cap of $250,000 for death claims. And so it comes out of that. It's called the vaccine injury compensation fund.
They still are not on the hook for it, no.
Right. And well, and I'll add to it in that this, when you sue the government, it's not like you get an article three judge, you know, article one, two, and three of the constitution, article three created the judiciary. There are judges that are, you know, that are nominated and confirmed by the Senate. You don't get an article three judge.
You get something called a special master in this program, which is, I will submit is in many ways policy driven. So there are things that will compensate they don't want to compensate dead babies as basically almost on a policy basis, okay? There are things- Why? Well, that would, people won't vaccinate. Come on. I mean, ideology around these products is very strong. That I don't joke about.
I mean, people are very ideological around this product. They believe without vaccines, everyone will die. I mean, that's the typical retort. Oh, you want a proper clinical trial? Everyone will die and get polio. Oh, you filed a petition on a novel polio vaccine from 1990 that would have left nobody without a polio vaccine, even if granted, that just asked for a proper clinical trial?
Showing 141–160 of 358 · page 8 of 18
← Previous
Next →