Alan Wong
speaker
440 appearances
6 recordings
1 series
first heard Jan 2026
last heard 1 Sep
Alan Wong’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.
Trend
recordings per month · last 12 monthsRecordings per month over the last 12 months — 6 in all, peaking in Sep 2026 with 1.
Appearances
basic information as to, well, what is that noise going to be?
And if they provided this information, I did hear from them that, well, flights are at 93% of capacity, so not a big deal when they get to 100%.
But the EIR is supposed to say, what does that mean?
What is the decibel difference going to result from that growth?
And the EIR fundamentally does not include that basic information.
And again, it's required to, if you're going to use 2045 as the baseline, you've got to set forth what those noise levels are.
And if they did have that information, then they would have some evidence that they could use to explain why they can or cannot justify 2045 versus existing conditions as the baseline.
But until you have that basic information there, they don't have the substantial evidence to even support the approach that they've taken.
And they've clearly not complied with the mandate in CEQA to
present that information.
The one other point I heard was that Palo Alto's filing this for non-sequel reasons.
I'm flabbergasted by that.
I think that's a point that's just a misfire on their part.
Obviously, we're concerned about
increased noise from increase in future flights over Palo Alto.
That's a quintessential CEQA question.
That's why we're here.
Obviously, there's some existing noise issues we want solved, but this plan exacerbates those existing noise issues, and we are legitimately under CEQA asking for those to be addressed.
And I don't think I have anything else to add.
Of future noise baseline conditions from air traffic.
Showing 341–360 of 440 · page 18 of 22
← Previous
Next →