Alex Nunez
speaker
7,337 appearances
30 recordings
2 series
first heard Oct 2023
last heard 19 Aug
Alex Nunez’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.
Trend
recordings per month · last 12 monthsRecordings per month over the last 12 months — 12 in all, peaking in Feb 2026 with 2.
Appearances
It's the non-residential, the commercial that have the trip reduction target enforcement piece to it.
So then going back to the point about offering flexibility within the toolkit, I see that the toolkit offers both a calculation of the associated reduction along with an estimated cost to the measure.
So if it is a user proposed reduction approach, how would you calculate the resultant reduction that comes with that?
I think we'd ask them first if they've been implemented in other places and to look for that.
We're not the only city with a TDM ordinance, so I'm sure there's lots of other cases out there that we can look towards, but we would be asking the applicant to prove that, and then we would also verify it on their annual reporting that it is truly doing what they intended it to do.
And then going back to the point about having residential projects adopt different measures from the toolkit or beyond, I do feel some of the strategies proposed there are not really enforceable within a residential setting.
For instance, some of the carpooling measures, the transit subsidies, providing the free door-to-door transit, a lot of them seem to be more associated with costs and not necessarily guaranteeing outcomes the way you might in a commercial context.
Then I want to talk about maybe looking at measures that do have measurable impact on reducing trips generated from housing projects.
And that goes to the two things that you say can't be combined to go after the enhanced.
compliance, which is the unbundled parking as well as limited parking supply.
And I think in many instances, particularly when you look at TOD projects that are close to TOD's transit, and you look at dense urban infill type of projects,
It seems like unbundling parking as well as limiting parking is a prompt to get residents to use alternate modes of transport.
So what is the rationale behind using two of these like really good carrots and not including them in achieving the enhanced compliance?
More questions for the staff here.
So going back to the TMA membership, I understand that it's not, it's an optional and it's not enforced.
but is, so to the extent that developers enroll into the TMA, it sort of helps the overall membership and it helps the service of the shuttle, right?
So why is that not targeted as a core strategy and instead as an auxiliary strategy?
Because it seems to have a pretty big impact in creating an alternate mode of transportation that can service parts of town that are not proximate to transit.
And so the last question is, in order to establish a PBID, does it have to go to ballot and get voted on?
Okay, thank you.
Showing 1181–1200 of 7,337 · page 60 of 367
← Previous
Next →