Amin Elhassan

valid counter argument and b what you're detecting is the difference in how people feel about charles how people feel lebron and charles has a likability that allows him even when he's logically been defeated yeah but i still like charles more so we're gonna save your thin skin that part though the career as a bad boy that includes the judge asking him hey charles do you have any regrets about throwing a man through a plate glass window

But see, I think that's my point in that you took the Shaq route right there.

The Shaq route is I'm a better player than you, so you can't say anything to me.

What LeBron did, which is why...

In a logical sense, he wins the argument.

I'm not even talking about how I played the game, like the caliber of player I am, I'm talking about

Professionalism, because that's what you're attacking.

You're not attacking, hey, you're shooting too many threes.

You're saying me complaining about the makeup of our roster is inappropriate.

Well, let's talk about people behaving inappropriately during their playing careers.

And then he lists off Charles Barkley.

He could have gone, I'm a better player.

He went, I'm a better person.

Well, I'm a more professional person.

How dare you question my professionalism?

But as we talk about like the elections, right?

Like it's the same thing.

It's like sometimes everything logically you're saying says you should be the winner of this argument.

But people just like the other guy for some reason.

They were like, why?