Anastasia Nicolazzi
speaker
1,398 appearances
24 recordings
1 series
first heard Nov 2024
last heard Jun 2025
Anastasia Nicolazzi’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.
Trend
recordings per month · last 12 monthsNo recordings in the last 12 months.Older appearances are listed below; set an alert to hear about the next one.
Appearances
Throughout the course of the interview, Semayoya was cooperative and cordial. But that doesn't mean there wasn't something that immediately raised red flags with detectives.
Some people think that the singular win of a suspect interview is to elicit a confession, but that is definitely not always the case. Sometimes the methodical collection of information, confirming timelines and locations, can be just as important. Case in point, proving that the phone number used to hire the driver on the night of the murder belonged to the suspect.
Almost immediately, Samaoya realized he had made a grave mistake, positively identifying himself as the man that cameras and witnesses had spotted at both the Holiday Inn and the gas station across the street.
But there's also another item that as a prosecutor, I would be interested in finding. And that would be the murder weapon.
Predictably, his first phone call was to his girlfriend, and the drama that ensued gave investigators a window into Semioya's state of mind, and possibly his motive.
It was a stunning admission that potentially revealed more than just the location of the murder weapon. Gail was the woman in the photo that an agitated Semioya had shown to witnesses before shooting Jamal Drummond. She was clearly at the center of this crime, but in what capacity?
Recorded jailhouse calls between the suspect in Jamal Drummond's murder, Claudio Ivan Semioya, and his girlfriend had provided some pretty incriminating, albeit circumstantial, evidence that Ivan Semioya was indeed Jamal's killer.
The girlfriend's willingness to cooperate gave investigators their first clue about her level of loyalty to Semioya, as well as the unlikelihood that she was involved in the actual crime itself. And the phone? Well, that proved to be everything they hoped for and more.
You know, when you look at what we're hearing about these two and their relationship, you know, there are those relationships that thrive on the negative. You know, it's the excitement and also the curse. So, again, is this indicative of someone who is controlled or abused? You know, that role play, strong and tough one minute, but – When you want out of the roles, you can't leave.
It's really definitely, it sounds at least to me, dysfunctional. But again, is there coercive control playing in here, you know, or power plays at even a higher level? Or is it just the back and forth that these two have signed on for? But as you said, Scott, at the end of the day, is she part and parcel?
And while I'd say it doesn't seem like it, certainly at the end, whether it's helping cover for something, well, that I think is less clear or maybe more clear, I should say.
As other cases have shown us, the victim, or I should say the survivor of abuse, is not always the most reliable witness. She could choose to cooperate in an effort to free herself from that abusive partner, or she might also come to his defense. And obviously I'm saying she and he, but it could go any which way.
Here's part of that recorded interview.
But that does not mean that Jamal's murder was purely a crime of passion. In fact, investigators had collected convincing evidence that suggested Samayoya's actions were thought out and deliberate.
Paul and his fellow investigators had given prosecutors a treasure trove of evidence to hopefully successfully make their case. But as we have discussed so many times before, when it comes to trial, there is no such thing as a slam dunk.
Plus, you had the location data from his cell phone that placed him at the scene. So even without his actual phone, prosecutors still had a pretty strong case.
But being able to show the jury a photo of him posing with a possible murder weapon that had existed right there on his phone, or the text where he brags about being wanted, I absolutely can certainly understand Paul and the prosecutors' frustrations about losing that evidence.
I have to stop for a second because Paul's discussion of his decision that ended up being a misstep, to me that is so important to discuss beyond the actual loss of evidence itself. You know, his straightforwardness, hey, this is a misstep. That's exactly the type of transparency that is key to what I hope. would instill more trust in our system because people make mistakes.
Most are not nefarious or ill-intended. And when they are, of course, it's a different story, completely no excuse. But when they aren't, we hope they don't hurt a case too much. And luckily here it didn't, but we're all human.
And Scott and I, you and I have had this conversation many times before, but we all make mistakes and Paul's honesty and insight about it, I found to be really important to stop here for a moment and highlight.
Showing 821–840 of 1,398 · page 42 of 70
← Previous
Next →