Andrea Canning
👤 PersonAppearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
I just looked up, just curious, Cowboys for Angels, and that's the number four. Elite straight male companionship for the discerning woman. Luxurious, professional, discreet, operating nationwide since 2008.
I just looked up, just curious, Cowboys for Angels, and that's the number four. Elite straight male companionship for the discerning woman. Luxurious, professional, discreet, operating nationwide since 2008.
I just looked up, just curious, Cowboys for Angels, and that's the number four. Elite straight male companionship for the discerning woman. Luxurious, professional, discreet, operating nationwide since 2008.
Mm-hmm. The prosecution asked Jane about a 2023 text she sent to Combs, and it's reminiscent of Cassie's texts and testimony. It is.
Mm-hmm. The prosecution asked Jane about a 2023 text she sent to Combs, and it's reminiscent of Cassie's texts and testimony. It is.
Mm-hmm. The prosecution asked Jane about a 2023 text she sent to Combs, and it's reminiscent of Cassie's texts and testimony. It is.
Also in that 2023 text, Jane states pretty clearly that she doesn't want to keep taking part in these encounters.
Also in that 2023 text, Jane states pretty clearly that she doesn't want to keep taking part in these encounters.
Also in that 2023 text, Jane states pretty clearly that she doesn't want to keep taking part in these encounters.
It really sounds like part of her probably wants to be with him, and she loves him, and then part of her also doesn't want to lose sort of the perks, right, that go along with him. Is that fair?
It really sounds like part of her probably wants to be with him, and she loves him, and then part of her also doesn't want to lose sort of the perks, right, that go along with him. Is that fair?
It really sounds like part of her probably wants to be with him, and she loves him, and then part of her also doesn't want to lose sort of the perks, right, that go along with him. Is that fair?
Yeah, I think it's also going to be hard for the jurors to differentiate between, you know, was Jane just trying to please Diddy or was she forced to do this?
Yeah, I think it's also going to be hard for the jurors to differentiate between, you know, was Jane just trying to please Diddy or was she forced to do this?
Yeah, I think it's also going to be hard for the jurors to differentiate between, you know, was Jane just trying to please Diddy or was she forced to do this?
Are the jurors, you know, as you're telling me this story, it's all very interesting. But I'm thinking to myself, the jurors have been there for a long time now. They're hearing a lot of the same type of testimony. Are they getting fatigued at all?
Are the jurors, you know, as you're telling me this story, it's all very interesting. But I'm thinking to myself, the jurors have been there for a long time now. They're hearing a lot of the same type of testimony. Are they getting fatigued at all?
Are the jurors, you know, as you're telling me this story, it's all very interesting. But I'm thinking to myself, the jurors have been there for a long time now. They're hearing a lot of the same type of testimony. Are they getting fatigued at all?
Chloe, break it down for us as best you can about how Jane fits into this RICO conspiracy case, what her testimony could do to bolster the prosecution's case.
Chloe, break it down for us as best you can about how Jane fits into this RICO conspiracy case, what her testimony could do to bolster the prosecution's case.