Andrej Karpathy

Nothing dominates.

Everything plus 20%.

Right.

Interesting.

This is like roughly what I've seen.

So I guess I have two answers to that.

Number one, I'm almost tempted to, like, reject the question entirely because, again, like, I see this as an extension of computing.

Have we talked about, like, how to chart progress in computing or how do you chart progress in computing since 1970s or whatever?

What is the x-axis?

So I kind of feel like the whole question is kind of, like, funny from that perspective a little bit.

But I will say, I guess, like, when people talk about AI and the original AGI and how we spoke about it when we – when OpenAI started –

AGI was a system you can go to that can do any task that is economically valuable, any economically valuable task at human performance or better.

Okay.

So that was the definition.

And I was pretty happy with that at the time.

And I kind of feel like I've stuck to that definition forever.

And then people have made up all kinds of other definitions.

But I feel like I like that definition.

Now, number one, the first concession that people make all the time is they just take out all the physical stuff because we're just talking about digital knowledge work.

I feel like that's a pretty major concession compared to the original definition, which was like any task a human can do.