Andrew Prokop

So this is more related to kind of the prosecutions and investigations of Donald Trump, which often involved certain people who either used to be or are at these law firms. And so I think he has some resentment about that. And then there's also, again, there's this right-wing agenda, activist agenda as well, where they argue that, oh, these big law firms are kind of

So this is more related to kind of the prosecutions and investigations of Donald Trump, which often involved certain people who either used to be or are at these law firms. And so I think he has some resentment about that. And then there's also, again, there's this right-wing agenda, activist agenda as well, where they argue that, oh, these big law firms are kind of

So this is more related to kind of the prosecutions and investigations of Donald Trump, which often involved certain people who either used to be or are at these law firms. And so I think he has some resentment about that. And then there's also, again, there's this right-wing agenda, activist agenda as well, where they argue that, oh, these big law firms are kind of

in their own way, centers of progressive activism as well in what's known as the pro bono work that they offer to do for various causes. So, you know, you have this Trump effort to kind of punish these big law firms. And as we saw in universities as well, of kind of deals or agreements in which they say, oh, OK, we will do these things differently.

in their own way, centers of progressive activism as well in what's known as the pro bono work that they offer to do for various causes. So, you know, you have this Trump effort to kind of punish these big law firms. And as we saw in universities as well, of kind of deals or agreements in which they say, oh, OK, we will do these things differently.

in their own way, centers of progressive activism as well in what's known as the pro bono work that they offer to do for various causes. So, you know, you have this Trump effort to kind of punish these big law firms. And as we saw in universities as well, of kind of deals or agreements in which they say, oh, OK, we will do these things differently.

We will pledge this amount of pro bono work or money to these causes that Trump likes and so on.

We will pledge this amount of pro bono work or money to these causes that Trump likes and so on.

We will pledge this amount of pro bono work or money to these causes that Trump likes and so on.

The president can do a lot of things that with his authority that he perhaps due to older notions of decorum or fairness or ethics that seem out of date in this administration that he would not have previously done. But they're also just doing a lot of stuff that seems completely illegal. And so why not both?

The president can do a lot of things that with his authority that he perhaps due to older notions of decorum or fairness or ethics that seem out of date in this administration that he would not have previously done. But they're also just doing a lot of stuff that seems completely illegal. And so why not both?

The president can do a lot of things that with his authority that he perhaps due to older notions of decorum or fairness or ethics that seem out of date in this administration that he would not have previously done. But they're also just doing a lot of stuff that seems completely illegal. And so why not both?

They're they're pursuing both and they're going to see what sticks because they fundamentally view politics and the purpose of government as about punishing their enemies. And which in this case, they've defined so broadly as to define like as to encompass all sorts of liberal or left leaning institutions, as well as the specific people and issues.

They're they're pursuing both and they're going to see what sticks because they fundamentally view politics and the purpose of government as about punishing their enemies. And which in this case, they've defined so broadly as to define like as to encompass all sorts of liberal or left leaning institutions, as well as the specific people and issues.

They're they're pursuing both and they're going to see what sticks because they fundamentally view politics and the purpose of government as about punishing their enemies. And which in this case, they've defined so broadly as to define like as to encompass all sorts of liberal or left leaning institutions, as well as the specific people and issues.

groups that had that ever run afoul of Donald Trump personally.

groups that had that ever run afoul of Donald Trump personally.

groups that had that ever run afoul of Donald Trump personally.

For more than half a century, the U.S. had a rule that said anyone that does business with the federal government, from Boeing to FedEx and Pfizer to Johns Hopkins, had to take affirmative action toward hiring people regardless of race, color or creed. On day one of his presidency, Donald Trump ended that rule.

For more than half a century, the U.S. had a rule that said anyone that does business with the federal government, from Boeing to FedEx and Pfizer to Johns Hopkins, had to take affirmative action toward hiring people regardless of race, color or creed. On day one of his presidency, Donald Trump ended that rule.