Andrew Weissmann

And so the main issue was that the administration, which always could have taken the normal route, which was to give people hearings, and if you can prove that the statute applies and that these people are within the group that can be deported, If you do that at a hearing, you could deport them. But instead, they wanted to just be like, no, we're just going to take unilateral action.

And so the main issue was that the administration, which always could have taken the normal route, which was to give people hearings, and if you can prove that the statute applies and that these people are within the group that can be deported, If you do that at a hearing, you could deport them. But instead, they wanted to just be like, no, we're just going to take unilateral action.

And so the main issue was that the administration, which always could have taken the normal route, which was to give people hearings, and if you can prove that the statute applies and that these people are within the group that can be deported, If you do that at a hearing, you could deport them. But instead, they wanted to just be like, no, we're just going to take unilateral action.

And as one judge said, just scoop people off the street with no legal authority whatsoever and ship them off. And the Supreme Court, nine justices said, you can't do that. So to me, that is sort of the part of the story that people need to lead with, which is, I mean, when do you ever have nine of these particular Supreme Court justices agreeing that due process was violated?

And as one judge said, just scoop people off the street with no legal authority whatsoever and ship them off. And the Supreme Court, nine justices said, you can't do that. So to me, that is sort of the part of the story that people need to lead with, which is, I mean, when do you ever have nine of these particular Supreme Court justices agreeing that due process was violated?

And as one judge said, just scoop people off the street with no legal authority whatsoever and ship them off. And the Supreme Court, nine justices said, you can't do that. So to me, that is sort of the part of the story that people need to lead with, which is, I mean, when do you ever have nine of these particular Supreme Court justices agreeing that due process was violated?

I don't think that is going to work. It remains to be seen exactly what's necessary, but this is one where when you read the Sotomayor opinion, which Amy Coney Barrett joined, you really get the sense that this has to be appropriate to the occasion and with sufficient notice to be heard. Here, it's not clear that the authority, the Alien Enemies Act, even applies.

I don't think that is going to work. It remains to be seen exactly what's necessary, but this is one where when you read the Sotomayor opinion, which Amy Coney Barrett joined, you really get the sense that this has to be appropriate to the occasion and with sufficient notice to be heard. Here, it's not clear that the authority, the Alien Enemies Act, even applies.

I don't think that is going to work. It remains to be seen exactly what's necessary, but this is one where when you read the Sotomayor opinion, which Amy Coney Barrett joined, you really get the sense that this has to be appropriate to the occasion and with sufficient notice to be heard. Here, it's not clear that the authority, the Alien Enemies Act, even applies.

So there has to be an opportunity to litigate that. What's the invasion? What's the invasion of a foreign country? Then you also have to be able to challenge, are you part of the group? Are you actually in this group or is it a mistake? To quote one of the judges in D.C.

So there has to be an opportunity to litigate that. What's the invasion? What's the invasion of a foreign country? Then you also have to be able to challenge, are you part of the group? Are you actually in this group or is it a mistake? To quote one of the judges in D.C.

So there has to be an opportunity to litigate that. What's the invasion? What's the invasion of a foreign country? Then you also have to be able to challenge, are you part of the group? Are you actually in this group or is it a mistake? To quote one of the judges in D.C.

in looking at the precedent, she said, you understand that Nazis were given more process before we deported them than you have afforded these people. It remains to be seen exactly how much there is, and frankly, reasonable minds could differ. But I do think we should take, for now, this is a good decision, saying you actually have to do this.

in looking at the precedent, she said, you understand that Nazis were given more process before we deported them than you have afforded these people. It remains to be seen exactly how much there is, and frankly, reasonable minds could differ. But I do think we should take, for now, this is a good decision, saying you actually have to do this.

in looking at the precedent, she said, you understand that Nazis were given more process before we deported them than you have afforded these people. It remains to be seen exactly how much there is, and frankly, reasonable minds could differ. But I do think we should take, for now, this is a good decision, saying you actually have to do this.

And it protects everyone, not just people who are xenophobic and thinking, oh, this is just about other people and not Americans. When you don't have any process, this could apply to anyone.

And it protects everyone, not just people who are xenophobic and thinking, oh, this is just about other people and not Americans. When you don't have any process, this could apply to anyone.

And it protects everyone, not just people who are xenophobic and thinking, oh, this is just about other people and not Americans. When you don't have any process, this could apply to anyone.

Yeah. So this is a really good question. So the court says under this vehicle called habeas, you have to bring the case where the body is. So if you're detained in New York, you bring it in New York. If you're detained in Texas, you bring it in Texas. So of course, if you're in El Salvador because they removed you, you can't bring it in El Salvador because guess what? There's no U.S. court there.

Yeah. So this is a really good question. So the court says under this vehicle called habeas, you have to bring the case where the body is. So if you're detained in New York, you bring it in New York. If you're detained in Texas, you bring it in Texas. So of course, if you're in El Salvador because they removed you, you can't bring it in El Salvador because guess what? There's no U.S. court there.