Andrew Weissmann

That's not like the government's job is not to like protect from that.

Yeah, protect your feelings.

Especially when there's such an important outcry and you have Congress having made a determination about weighing those things.

So I think that that gives the Department of Justice a lot more leeway.

The other thing you could do, let's say you have an image.

Let's, you know, Senator Whitehouse asked the Attorney General about

reports that there was an image of Donald Trump with half-naked young women.

And she refused to answer whether she saw it or not.

Let's assume, again, hypothetically, let's assume that image exists.

And let's assume you don't have the consent of those underage young women.

no longer underage women, half-naked women with Donald Trump.

Again, the question that Senator Whitehouse put, if you don't have their consent, you could always sort of fuzz out and anonymize their faces and still release that kind of material.

So there's really a way forward if this was an administration that was forward-leaning and wanted to release it.

And obviously, this is an administration that has no problem besmirching people

Thank you very much.

Oh, gee, no, now we have a moral fiber.

We don't want to accuse people of things that they haven't been charged with.

It really comes with poor grace when you're talking about this administration, which has no problem labeling people without being charged.

Moving on to Maxwell.

The prisoner who's in the camp who's playing with a puppy.