Andrew Weissmann

Instead, the conversation is, oh, you should tell the court we can't do anything and let them sit there and rot, even though it was our mistake. The lawlessness and cruelty combination is off the charts.

Instead, the conversation is, oh, you should tell the court we can't do anything and let them sit there and rot, even though it was our mistake. The lawlessness and cruelty combination is off the charts.

You're totally right.

You're totally right.

You're totally right.

Sure. I actually think this is, on the whole,

Sure. I actually think this is, on the whole,

Sure. I actually think this is, on the whole,

So here's my effort to good news. There is a 5-4 gendered part of this case where the five men said this should have been brought under a vehicle called habeas. And the four said, no, it's fine to have brought it the way it was under something called the Administrative Procedure Act. That is a very technical issue. I agree with the the foreign dissent, about the mechanism.

So here's my effort to good news. There is a 5-4 gendered part of this case where the five men said this should have been brought under a vehicle called habeas. And the four said, no, it's fine to have brought it the way it was under something called the Administrative Procedure Act. That is a very technical issue. I agree with the the foreign dissent, about the mechanism.

So here's my effort to good news. There is a 5-4 gendered part of this case where the five men said this should have been brought under a vehicle called habeas. And the four said, no, it's fine to have brought it the way it was under something called the Administrative Procedure Act. That is a very technical issue. I agree with the the foreign dissent, about the mechanism.

And the mechanism is important because it leads to sort of what court you have to go to and where it should be. But the main issue was, did the government have to afford all of these people due process prior to moving them out of the country? Nine justices said yes. That part is sort of getting overlooked by the sort of 5-4 split on the procedural issue.

And the mechanism is important because it leads to sort of what court you have to go to and where it should be. But the main issue was, did the government have to afford all of these people due process prior to moving them out of the country? Nine justices said yes. That part is sort of getting overlooked by the sort of 5-4 split on the procedural issue.

And the mechanism is important because it leads to sort of what court you have to go to and where it should be. But the main issue was, did the government have to afford all of these people due process prior to moving them out of the country? Nine justices said yes. That part is sort of getting overlooked by the sort of 5-4 split on the procedural issue.

And I'm not trying to say the procedural isn't important. Although, footnote, because the court said you had to do this under habeas, that immediately happened. People brought a habeas case in New York. They brought a habeas case in Texas in front of a conservative judge in Texas, a so-called liberal judge in New York. Both issued stays.

And I'm not trying to say the procedural isn't important. Although, footnote, because the court said you had to do this under habeas, that immediately happened. People brought a habeas case in New York. They brought a habeas case in Texas in front of a conservative judge in Texas, a so-called liberal judge in New York. Both issued stays.

And I'm not trying to say the procedural isn't important. Although, footnote, because the court said you had to do this under habeas, that immediately happened. People brought a habeas case in New York. They brought a habeas case in Texas in front of a conservative judge in Texas, a so-called liberal judge in New York. Both issued stays.

So yes, the mechanism had to be different, but the stay went back into effect by two separate judges. The stay on deporting new people based on that. Exactly. Exactly.

So yes, the mechanism had to be different, but the stay went back into effect by two separate judges. The stay on deporting new people based on that. Exactly. Exactly.

So yes, the mechanism had to be different, but the stay went back into effect by two separate judges. The stay on deporting new people based on that. Exactly. Exactly.