Anne (Anne Thormey - primary proponent arguing we should pay for water)

speaker
547 appearances 1 recordings 1 series first heard Jul 2026 last heard 14 Jul

Anne (Anne Thormey - primary proponent arguing we should pay for water)’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.

Trend

recordings per month · last 12 months
1 · Jul OctJan 26AprJulnow

Recordings per month over the last 12 months — 1 in all, peaking in Jul 2026 with 1.

Appearances

newest first · ▶ plays the moment
I'm very delighted.
Nobody, nobody who's been interviewed yet thinks we shouldn't pay for our water.
I think that's wonderful.
I really thought I'd be the only person who said we should pay.
I'm delighted that my compatriots agree that we should pay for a minimum of water.
And if we use excess, we pay.
I don't think we should be paying for water.
I think it's a dangerous road to go down, actually, you know?
Well, there's a few things.
I wonder, you know, when it gets hot, this issue comes up a little bit, you know, but I also feel like that's kind of we shouldn't be paying for the massive water use of the data centres either, and that's also putting pressure on our system at the moment, you know?
But aside from that, it's what happens after you get charges.
It's a kind of, it can often end up in a creeping privatisation, like an
As you said yourself, like Irish Water, someone said, I think, earlier on that they've dropped leaks by 30%, which is amazing, you know.
But as you said yourself, Irish Water are spending billions on those.
Those obviously are billions.
They're not bringing that out of nowhere.
But in England, they have paid, since privatisation, £65 billion sterling to shareholders in profits.
And at the same time, they didn't choose to put that £65 billion back into...
upgrade in the water structure now.
They gave it out to shareholders in profit and they actually increased the CEO salaries there.
Showing 421–440 of 547 · page 22 of 28 ← Previous Next →