Annie Jacobsen

Because we're in agreement that the technology is incredible and has the potential to take us and is taking us to these remarkable places.

So why is it then that it's so looked down upon or thought of as perhaps Pollyanna-ish technology?

To see what Reagan did, like to stop seeing everybody as an enemy that must be killed and do the garbage, like see them as an adversary.

You want to beat your adversary.

You want to beat your opponent in a sportsmanlike manner.

You want to be better than them.

You want to outperform them.

But you don't necessarily need to kill them.

I don't know if that's the difference between being a woman and a man.

But why is it that there isn't more of a movement toward this idea that we as a world have all this incredible technology?

I mean, it sounds even...

It sounds silly even saying such a thing, but I'm saying it.

Why isn't there a movement to stop looking at people as someone to kill?

You think it's inherent in humans.

But brilliance and folly is a more interesting way of looking at it than good and evil.

Yeah.

Which automatically puts it in a moral context, which makes people even argue further.

It'll be 1980s empire instead of chimp empire.

But ultimately... You freak out about technology specifically.

It's wise to realize how we're not gonna even have an opportunity to see what happens to AI if one madman with a nuclear missile decides to do a bolt out of the blue attack.