Anoushka Mutanda-Dougherty

OK, given what we just spoke about at the top of the programme about potentially the state of his mental well-being or ability to understand what is criminal and what isn't. How could you potentially argue that he wasn't sane enough to make those decisions, but he is sane enough to make big decisions about these procedures and what to do in regards to his freedom?

And a lot of Sean's. Can I just say that's been a particular thing over here, making sure we're getting the right spelling of each Sean. So those were the main points of the precourt trial hearing. Cheyenne, there was just another conversation about a medical procedure that one of the victims may have undergone.

And a lot of Sean's. Can I just say that's been a particular thing over here, making sure we're getting the right spelling of each Sean. So those were the main points of the precourt trial hearing. Cheyenne, there was just another conversation about a medical procedure that one of the victims may have undergone.

And a lot of Sean's. Can I just say that's been a particular thing over here, making sure we're getting the right spelling of each Sean. So those were the main points of the precourt trial hearing. Cheyenne, there was just another conversation about a medical procedure that one of the victims may have undergone.

Now, the judge didn't rule on this, but can you just fill us in on what that was all about? And Sean, I'll come to you after that.

Now, the judge didn't rule on this, but can you just fill us in on what that was all about? And Sean, I'll come to you after that.

Now, the judge didn't rule on this, but can you just fill us in on what that was all about? And Sean, I'll come to you after that.

Now, just before we go, because we've been talking a little bit about the prospective jury questionnaires that have been filed, here are some interesting ones that I picked up from the defence and prosecution side, or ones that I just found, some of them a bit comical. One of them for the defence was, do you believe that wealthy people get away with things that less wealthy people do not?

Now, just before we go, because we've been talking a little bit about the prospective jury questionnaires that have been filed, here are some interesting ones that I picked up from the defence and prosecution side, or ones that I just found, some of them a bit comical. One of them for the defence was, do you believe that wealthy people get away with things that less wealthy people do not?

Now, just before we go, because we've been talking a little bit about the prospective jury questionnaires that have been filed, here are some interesting ones that I picked up from the defence and prosecution side, or ones that I just found, some of them a bit comical. One of them for the defence was, do you believe that wealthy people get away with things that less wealthy people do not?

I mean, Sean, what are they asking the implication of that, that people have more access to resources and good lawyers if they're wealthy?

I mean, Sean, what are they asking the implication of that, that people have more access to resources and good lawyers if they're wealthy?

I mean, Sean, what are they asking the implication of that, that people have more access to resources and good lawyers if they're wealthy?

Wouldn't that rule everybody out? Because everybody would be like, well, that's the defense's questionnaire. So they'd be like, well, you're all obviously skewed against Diddy.

Wouldn't that rule everybody out? Because everybody would be like, well, that's the defense's questionnaire. So they'd be like, well, you're all obviously skewed against Diddy.

Wouldn't that rule everybody out? Because everybody would be like, well, that's the defense's questionnaire. So they'd be like, well, you're all obviously skewed against Diddy.

And the one from the prosecution that I thought really stuck out was, you may hear evidence that other individuals in addition to the defendant were involved in these alleged crimes. Those other individuals are not on trial here and you may not draw any inference, favourable or unfavourable, towards the government or the defendant from that fact.

And the one from the prosecution that I thought really stuck out was, you may hear evidence that other individuals in addition to the defendant were involved in these alleged crimes. Those other individuals are not on trial here and you may not draw any inference, favourable or unfavourable, towards the government or the defendant from that fact.

And the one from the prosecution that I thought really stuck out was, you may hear evidence that other individuals in addition to the defendant were involved in these alleged crimes. Those other individuals are not on trial here and you may not draw any inference, favourable or unfavourable, towards the government or the defendant from that fact.

You may also not speculate as to the reason why other persons are not on trial in this case. Do you have any concern that you could not follow this instruction? Well, surely that depends on who the people are. You're going to have those questions immediately.