Anoushka Mutanda-Dougherty

The prior drafts should be produced by April 25th, 2025. So the judge has said you need to produce the previous drafts of the memoir and give them to the defence? Yes.

And you mentioned there briefly another motion that was granted for Diddy to see the outtakes of a documentary that was made by Warner Brothers, Discovery Inc., the downfall of Diddy. We covered it on the podcast. He was asking to see the outtakes of TV interviews that they did with two people, person A and person B. One of them is a chef of Diddy's and one of them was a previous romantic partner.

And you mentioned there briefly another motion that was granted for Diddy to see the outtakes of a documentary that was made by Warner Brothers, Discovery Inc., the downfall of Diddy. We covered it on the podcast. He was asking to see the outtakes of TV interviews that they did with two people, person A and person B. One of them is a chef of Diddy's and one of them was a previous romantic partner.

And you mentioned there briefly another motion that was granted for Diddy to see the outtakes of a documentary that was made by Warner Brothers, Discovery Inc., the downfall of Diddy. We covered it on the podcast. He was asking to see the outtakes of TV interviews that they did with two people, person A and person B. One of them is a chef of Diddy's and one of them was a previous romantic partner.

The judge has granted that he is now allowed to see those outtakes.

The judge has granted that he is now allowed to see those outtakes.

The judge has granted that he is now allowed to see those outtakes.

Well, so these are kind of in his favor. So he's had a few little wins.

Well, so these are kind of in his favor. So he's had a few little wins.

Well, so these are kind of in his favor. So he's had a few little wins.

It's a weird thing as a journalist, that ruling, because when you have witness testimony and someone is alleging that terrible things have happened to them and you're trying to provide a space for them to tell their story, to hold potentially somebody in a position of power to account, the idea that that space you create could then be used as evidence in a trial, it almost damages that process and makes people more reluctant to use the press as an arm of interrogating.

It's a weird thing as a journalist, that ruling, because when you have witness testimony and someone is alleging that terrible things have happened to them and you're trying to provide a space for them to tell their story, to hold potentially somebody in a position of power to account, the idea that that space you create could then be used as evidence in a trial, it almost damages that process and makes people more reluctant to use the press as an arm of interrogating.

It's a weird thing as a journalist, that ruling, because when you have witness testimony and someone is alleging that terrible things have happened to them and you're trying to provide a space for them to tell their story, to hold potentially somebody in a position of power to account, the idea that that space you create could then be used as evidence in a trial, it almost damages that process and makes people more reluctant to use the press as an arm of interrogating.

Yeah.

Yeah.

Yeah.

I'm assuming, though, that there's already pretty strong precedent for the ruling that the judge made on that. 100%.

I'm assuming, though, that there's already pretty strong precedent for the ruling that the judge made on that. 100%.

I'm assuming, though, that there's already pretty strong precedent for the ruling that the judge made on that. 100%.

I don't have but a buck oh five, Sean. Maybe you can have it. And then the last ruling, I think lots of people on social media were anticipating this. We know victim one is going to appear under their own name. Victim two, victim three, victim four can appear with pseudonyms. It doesn't say victim five here. It doesn't say victim five, right?