Anthony Pompliano

I'm sitting down with Teresa Goody-Geehan.

She's CZ's personal lawyer, and she's been very involved in the pardon that CZ received.

I've seen tons of controversy online as to the pardon he received, how he received it, whether it was pay to play, and if there was any corruption involved.

I reached out to Teresa and I said, why don't we sit down?

Let me ask you all of the questions that people have, the hard ones and the easy ones.

And that's what we're going to do in today's conversation.

Here's my conversation with Teresa Goodygean.

Teresa, you're here to give us the inside scoop on CZ, the pardon, and answer a lot of questions from many critics.

Help us understand what was CZ charged with and what was the rationale behind him getting this pardon?

Why do you think that he was treated differently?

Now, if I understand this correctly, the company itself was doing this or not doing this, and that's why they were, the regulators went after them.

Is it common for the executive to be held liable?

You know, on one hand, I could see people saying, hey, the CEO should be held liable for what the business does.

On the other hand,

my understanding just on some cursory Google searches is like, you know, large banks or other financial institutions have been charged with similar things, but the executives themselves have not been pulled into it.

What is kind of like the standard treatment and difference between the executive and the company?

So let's hold constant that, OK, we understand what he did.

We know it's a fact that he got the pardon.

I think that there is a plethora of questions.

I've seen people talk in private conversation.