Menu
Sign In Search Podcasts Charts People & Topics Add Podcast API Pricing

Anthony Romero

๐Ÿ‘ค Person
346 total appearances

Appearances Over Time

Podcast Appearances

The New Yorker Radio Hour
The A.C.L.U. v. Trump 2.0

I mean, Clinton passed some of the most egregious court-stripping measures. For example? Where he basically tried to get the courts out of the business of looking at prisons' rights cases or immigrants' rights cases. And that had to be litigated.

The New Yorker Radio Hour
The A.C.L.U. v. Trump 2.0

I mean, Clinton passed some of the most egregious court-stripping measures. For example? Where he basically tried to get the courts out of the business of looking at prisons' rights cases or immigrants' rights cases. And that had to be litigated.

The New Yorker Radio Hour
The A.C.L.U. v. Trump 2.0

I mean, Clinton passed some of the most egregious court-stripping measures. For example? Where he basically tried to get the courts out of the business of looking at prisons' rights cases or immigrants' rights cases. And that had to be litigated.

The New Yorker Radio Hour
The A.C.L.U. v. Trump 2.0

Totally agree. Totally agree. And we've got to take it one step at a time.

The New Yorker Radio Hour
The A.C.L.U. v. Trump 2.0

Totally agree. Totally agree. And we've got to take it one step at a time.

The New Yorker Radio Hour
The A.C.L.U. v. Trump 2.0

Totally agree. Totally agree. And we've got to take it one step at a time.

The New Yorker Radio Hour
The A.C.L.U. v. Trump 2.0

I think you have to call on, for instance, corporate leaders. We'll have to yank them into the pool with us. If they believe that part of what is going to protect good corporate interests or the workings of the economy is rule of law, there's got to be a moment when people are saying, can you countenance this?

The New Yorker Radio Hour
The A.C.L.U. v. Trump 2.0

I think you have to call on, for instance, corporate leaders. We'll have to yank them into the pool with us. If they believe that part of what is going to protect good corporate interests or the workings of the economy is rule of law, there's got to be a moment when people are saying, can you countenance this?

The New Yorker Radio Hour
The A.C.L.U. v. Trump 2.0

I think you have to call on, for instance, corporate leaders. We'll have to yank them into the pool with us. If they believe that part of what is going to protect good corporate interests or the workings of the economy is rule of law, there's got to be a moment when people are saying, can you countenance this?

The New Yorker Radio Hour
The A.C.L.U. v. Trump 2.0

I mean, President Biden had a number of instances where he also bristled at judicial oversight and judicial review. I mean, he hated the effort to shut down the student loan program. It's one of his signature programs. Never got it through because the courts got in his way.

The New Yorker Radio Hour
The A.C.L.U. v. Trump 2.0

I mean, President Biden had a number of instances where he also bristled at judicial oversight and judicial review. I mean, he hated the effort to shut down the student loan program. It's one of his signature programs. Never got it through because the courts got in his way.

The New Yorker Radio Hour
The A.C.L.U. v. Trump 2.0

I mean, President Biden had a number of instances where he also bristled at judicial oversight and judicial review. I mean, he hated the effort to shut down the student loan program. It's one of his signature programs. Never got it through because the courts got in his way.

The New Yorker Radio Hour
The A.C.L.U. v. Trump 2.0

But it's really quite another matter when there's a final order of the highest court of the land and the president just says, doesn't bother me. Don't have to heed you or hear you. That is a moment when I think we'll be able to harvest the opinions of people and get people engaged in a very different way. It won't matter the content. It will matter whether or not.

The New Yorker Radio Hour
The A.C.L.U. v. Trump 2.0

But it's really quite another matter when there's a final order of the highest court of the land and the president just says, doesn't bother me. Don't have to heed you or hear you. That is a moment when I think we'll be able to harvest the opinions of people and get people engaged in a very different way. It won't matter the content. It will matter whether or not.

The New Yorker Radio Hour
The A.C.L.U. v. Trump 2.0

But it's really quite another matter when there's a final order of the highest court of the land and the president just says, doesn't bother me. Don't have to heed you or hear you. That is a moment when I think we'll be able to harvest the opinions of people and get people engaged in a very different way. It won't matter the content. It will matter whether or not.

The New Yorker Radio Hour
The A.C.L.U. v. Trump 2.0

We will allow an executive branch to assume such extreme power.

The New Yorker Radio Hour
The A.C.L.U. v. Trump 2.0

We will allow an executive branch to assume such extreme power.

The New Yorker Radio Hour
The A.C.L.U. v. Trump 2.0

We will allow an executive branch to assume such extreme power.

The New Yorker Radio Hour
The A.C.L.U. v. Trump 2.0

And they're on the bench, and sometimes they watch his back, and sometimes they rule in ways that are kind ofโ€” head-scratching in terms of how far they will go to protect the person who put them on the bench. Also true, 65% of the judges have been appointed by Obama and Biden. So there's a larger number of them. That will change as they start to move judicial appointments.

The New Yorker Radio Hour
The A.C.L.U. v. Trump 2.0

And they're on the bench, and sometimes they watch his back, and sometimes they rule in ways that are kind ofโ€” head-scratching in terms of how far they will go to protect the person who put them on the bench. Also true, 65% of the judges have been appointed by Obama and Biden. So there's a larger number of them. That will change as they start to move judicial appointments.