Anushka Mutanda Dougherty
speaker
703 appearances
3 recordings
1 series
first heard Mar 2026
last heard 9 Apr
Anushka Mutanda Dougherty’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.
Trend
recordings per month · last 12 monthsRecordings per month over the last 12 months — 3 in all, peaking in Mar 2026 with 2.
Appearances
Justin Baldoni, it says in her complaint, claimed it was not normal for women to remain in their hospital gowns while giving birth.
Miss Lively disagreed but felt forced into a compromise that she would be naked from below the chest down.
So this is one of the things she cites as an example of sexual harassment in her amended complaint.
She says the set was crowded, chaotic, with no intimacy coordinator, and that Justin Baldoni then went to cast his personal friend as the OBGYN, which I call OBGYN, and I know that I'm not supposed to do that.
That's not how you say it.
The OBGYN.
Right.
So Justin Baldoni has said from the beginning, this is a pattern of claiming sexual harassment and that
forms part of a larger pattern of her trying to wrestle creative control of the movie in his response he said it is shameful that miss lively and her representatives would make such serious and categorically false accusations against mr baldoni wayfarer studios and its representatives and they've accused blake lively of making numerous demands and threats including threatening to not show up to set threatening to not promote the film which would end up ultimately leading to its demise during release if her demands were not met they're saying she's trying to wrestle creative control she's saying she was genuinely sexually harassed
What does the judge say?
He says the crux of these claims, he's talking about the law here, the crux of these claims, these sexual harassment claims, is that the defendants harassed Lively and subjected her to a hostile work environment on the basis of her sex and or gender.
Lively's allegations center largely around conduct which occurred on the set of the film during the first phase of production in New Jersey.
This on-set conduct occurred outside California and cannot support applying the statute's
extraterritorially.
Let's lawyer speak.
Sean, can you just translate that for me?
So that's the territory issue.
Now, the other half of this is something we've gone over pretty much every time we've spoken about this case.
The judge says, quote, lively sexual harassment and retaliation claims under these provisions can therefore proceed only if she was an employee rather than an independent contractor.
And the judge has deemed that she was an independent contractor and not an employee.
Showing 61–80 of 703 · page 4 of 36
← Previous
Next →