Ari Cohn

I mean, that's rhetorical hyperbole and opinion, so no.

I mean, that's rhetorical hyperbole and opinion, so no.

I mean, it's not just that it reads like an autobiography. It's that on the docket, at least as of, I think, like last weekend, I don't know if this has changed, but there was no lawyer for John Ruiz listed on the docket other than John Ruiz. So he would have filed it by himself, it looks like.

I mean, it's not just that it reads like an autobiography. It's that on the docket, at least as of, I think, like last weekend, I don't know if this has changed, but there was no lawyer for John Ruiz listed on the docket other than John Ruiz. So he would have filed it by himself, it looks like.

msp recovery or i'm very close it says msp recovery filed on behalf of him which could make sense if they were maybe like listed as his attorney but that would still be a weird way of saying it

msp recovery or i'm very close it says msp recovery filed on behalf of him which could make sense if they were maybe like listed as his attorney but that would still be a weird way of saying it

But also, let's kind of just get to one of the big picture issues of why none of this makes any sense, is that one of the primary claims here, and we'll get to why it's bullshit in a second, but one of the claims is that the Miami Herald defamed MSP recovery by saying it was the target of federal investigations.

But also, let's kind of just get to one of the big picture issues of why none of this makes any sense, is that one of the primary claims here, and we'll get to why it's bullshit in a second, but one of the claims is that the Miami Herald defamed MSP recovery by saying it was the target of federal investigations.

Now, if MSP recovery is the party that was defamed, MSP recovery has to be the party that sued, but the only named plaintiff is John Ruiz. So who is suing what attorneys representing who for what and who are the part? Like it, none of it makes any sense at all. MSP recovery isn't listed as a party. So I don't know how MSP being defamed has anything to do with the price of tea in China.

Now, if MSP recovery is the party that was defamed, MSP recovery has to be the party that sued, but the only named plaintiff is John Ruiz. So who is suing what attorneys representing who for what and who are the part? Like it, none of it makes any sense at all. MSP recovery isn't listed as a party. So I don't know how MSP being defamed has anything to do with the price of tea in China.

Yeah, these are mistakes that somebody straight out of law school wouldn't have made. You have to have the proper parties. It's beyond rookie mistake. It's just incomprehensible how somebody could make these mistakes.

Yeah, these are mistakes that somebody straight out of law school wouldn't have made. You have to have the proper parties. It's beyond rookie mistake. It's just incomprehensible how somebody could make these mistakes.

Yeah, well, you know, there is such a thing as the defamation proof plaintiff where, you know, their reputation is so shot already that nothing you say could possibly lower their esteem in the eyes of the community anymore. It takes a lot to get there. I don't know necessarily if they're there yet, but yikes.

Yeah, well, you know, there is such a thing as the defamation proof plaintiff where, you know, their reputation is so shot already that nothing you say could possibly lower their esteem in the eyes of the community anymore. It takes a lot to get there. I don't know necessarily if they're there yet, but yikes.

I mean, what's going on is obviously that John Ruiz doesn't like when people criticize his company. And he seems to think that...

I mean, what's going on is obviously that John Ruiz doesn't like when people criticize his company. And he seems to think that...

his word should be taken as gospel and anyone who doesn't credit his word um should i guess have to pay him five billion dollars i don't know um even when his word uh appears to be worth very little all things considered over the course of his history um you know it's it's quite bizarre it's really it's a strange lawsuit it doesn't really make any sense um is any of the defamation it reads to me as desperate honestly

his word should be taken as gospel and anyone who doesn't credit his word um should i guess have to pay him five billion dollars i don't know um even when his word uh appears to be worth very little all things considered over the course of his history um you know it's it's quite bizarre it's really it's a strange lawsuit it doesn't really make any sense um is any of the defamation it reads to me as desperate honestly

I mean, well, he gives the wrong definition for defamation at one point in the claim, so that's not really promising. I assume that maybe he has a vague general idea of what defamation is. I have zero idea. Zero belief, however, that he actually knows the ins and outs of defamation law and how one pleads it and proves it.

I mean, well, he gives the wrong definition for defamation at one point in the claim, so that's not really promising. I assume that maybe he has a vague general idea of what defamation is. I have zero idea. Zero belief, however, that he actually knows the ins and outs of defamation law and how one pleads it and proves it.