Ashley Merchant

When they scanned the indictment that was actually returned, it changed the page numbering and the actual numbering.

And we were trying to figure out, was that in front of the grand jury?

Was it not?

And everybody said, oh, well, it's just a scrotum error.

And I think this is the exact same thing.

It does, as long as it doesn't change the language of the indictment, it's going to stand.

It should totally be the end of this nonsense.

And because there's other judges bringing it up, they're trying to undermine the indictment.

They're trying to undermine the entire process.

And that gets out, you know, the world is watching, the world is listening.

And so any juror, potential juror on this case is going to know about that.

They're going to have heard that.

It's all over the news.

So it's really prejudicial when a judge is trying to intervene in such a manner and really put their thumb on the scales of justice.

This is a game of chess.

That's what he's doing.

This is not about defamation.

This is about discovery.

He wants to be able to depose people and he wants to be able to access documents in the public space and get discovery, get depositions, interrogatories, those type of thing.

If there's a lawsuit, you can get discovery and that's what he wants.