Barry Weiss

Jeff, I'd love for you to respond to a thing Tyler said that I suspect you disagree with and would love to hear your take on it about The idea of listening to China more. And Tyler, maybe you want to put a little bit more meat on the bones there so Jeff can respond to it. But that sentence stuck out to me. What do you mean by that?

Jeff, I'd love for you to respond to a thing Tyler said that I suspect you disagree with and would love to hear your take on it about The idea of listening to China more. And Tyler, maybe you want to put a little bit more meat on the bones there so Jeff can respond to it. But that sentence stuck out to me. What do you mean by that?

Tyler, I suspect there's a lot there that you do not agree with.

Tyler, I suspect there's a lot there that you do not agree with.

Tyler, I suspect there's a lot there that you do not agree with.

They may be our only peer country. I think that that's probably objectively – I think we would all agree with that. But the thing is they perceive themselves or at least the CCP perceives themselves to be in a kind of war with us and they want us to lose and they want to win. Do you agree that that's true?

They may be our only peer country. I think that that's probably objectively – I think we would all agree with that. But the thing is they perceive themselves or at least the CCP perceives themselves to be in a kind of war with us and they want us to lose and they want to win. Do you agree that that's true?

They may be our only peer country. I think that that's probably objectively – I think we would all agree with that. But the thing is they perceive themselves or at least the CCP perceives themselves to be in a kind of war with us and they want us to lose and they want to win. Do you agree that that's true?

Well, the big comparison that many historians make is that we're in a new Cold War. Neil Ferguson has called it Cold War II. And that in the same way that the first Cold War was about sort of the nuclear arms race, this one is about the AI technological race. Tyler, do you buy that as a comparison?

Well, the big comparison that many historians make is that we're in a new Cold War. Neil Ferguson has called it Cold War II. And that in the same way that the first Cold War was about sort of the nuclear arms race, this one is about the AI technological race. Tyler, do you buy that as a comparison?

Well, the big comparison that many historians make is that we're in a new Cold War. Neil Ferguson has called it Cold War II. And that in the same way that the first Cold War was about sort of the nuclear arms race, this one is about the AI technological race. Tyler, do you buy that as a comparison?

So— Let's draw that analogy out. The way the Cold War was won was not by saying to our adversaries, let's find a way to live together. It was by beating them, wasn't it?

So— Let's draw that analogy out. The way the Cold War was won was not by saying to our adversaries, let's find a way to live together. It was by beating them, wasn't it?

So— Let's draw that analogy out. The way the Cold War was won was not by saying to our adversaries, let's find a way to live together. It was by beating them, wasn't it?

But the thing is, I guess, you know, I remember the days that I was at the Wall Street Journal editorial page, and they very much believed in this analogy. And therefore, they believed that by opening up trade with China and by liberalizing China's economy, political liberalism or some kind of thing akin to democracy would necessarily follow in the same way that it did with the former Soviet Union.

But the thing is, I guess, you know, I remember the days that I was at the Wall Street Journal editorial page, and they very much believed in this analogy. And therefore, they believed that by opening up trade with China and by liberalizing China's economy, political liberalism or some kind of thing akin to democracy would necessarily follow in the same way that it did with the former Soviet Union.

But the thing is, I guess, you know, I remember the days that I was at the Wall Street Journal editorial page, and they very much believed in this analogy. And therefore, they believed that by opening up trade with China and by liberalizing China's economy, political liberalism or some kind of thing akin to democracy would necessarily follow in the same way that it did with the former Soviet Union.

But that didn't turn out to be true.

But that didn't turn out to be true.

But that didn't turn out to be true.