Basel Fakhoury

I will still have access to the amazing user interviews panel I've been used to.

There'll be the firepower of user testing behind it as well.

From the consumer's point of view, from the researcher's point of view, it doesn't sound like a huge amount is going to change immediately, maybe get a bit of branding and evolution in the tools as would happen if you went independent, right?

Baran, did you want to add something in there?

This is related.

I'm going to put it in any way.

You've emphasized that user interviews remains independent and open.

How do you plan to achieve that in practice?

It really builds off what we've been talking about anyway, but we might consolidate some ideas in there.

Mm-hmm.

Basil, did you want to add anything there?

Just having empathy for folks who are deep in procurement, because when you can procure one tool that offers you so many things versus handling multiple relationships, it's a real time saver.

You don't have to procure user interviews and user testing.

You get the whole lot bundled into one.

That can be a massive time saver.

Yeah, very cool.

I have got a couple of questions that came through from members of the ChaCha Club, not the dance club, a member's club for research ops professionals, and this is one of them.

Long-term, will user interviews continue to support integrations with unmoderated survey and testing platforms that are competitors to user testing?

These integrations are very, very valuable.

Great.