Bill Landis

I just think like that was a weakness of A&M that got exposed.

It wasn't a shining moment for the SEC.

I would say that it was basically the same game that Oklahoma and Alabama played earlier in the year.

They just flipped the roles.

It was almost exactly the same game.

The first game, Alabama outgained Oklahoma, like double the amount of yardage and kept shooting itself in the foot and lost.

And Oklahoma outgained Alabama and Alabama scored on the pick six.

And Oklahoma was missing field goals.

It was like and like dropping touchdown passes.

So it was not a particularly well played game.

No, I don't think so either.

But I also think maybe I have viewed Georgia a little differently than you.

So part of this is reinforced for me that Georgia is clearly the best team in the SEC.

And you've been viewing them that way for the back half of the season almost, haven't you?

yeah and we'll see like what's unfortunate about that i guess is that they have to play an sec team now um in the sugar bowl so i don't know and that's an sec team they already beat so we'll see what happens there but um yeah i don't know that i'm terribly surprised by any of it right like i i didn't think alabama and oklahoma were particularly impressive in the regular season oklahoma's defense i think is something to be respected um

But the way that A&M lost to Texas really took a lot of shine off of it for me, which is why I thought Miami was going to win that game today.

So I don't know.

I think it turned out maybe that the SEC and the Big Ten were both a little top-heavy, but the Big Ten was just top-heavy with a couple of teams, and the SEC was going to be top-heavy with one team.

on that um i'm not sure how you could be that unless you're just an alabama fan then like i guess i get it but um they played pretty poorly i mean they won on the road at oklahoma but i don't think they played great

I guess so.