Bill Stanton
speaker
31 appearances
3 recordings
1 series
first heard Mar 2025
last heard Mar 2025
Bill Stanton’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.
Trend
recordings per month · last 12 monthsNo recordings in the last 12 months.Older appearances are listed below; set an alert to hear about the next one.
Appearances
And that's why 12 years later, we're still talking about it, trying to solve it, because it's every person's, every parent's worst nightmare. Someone coming into your home in the middle of the night and taking the most precious thing that you'll ever have in your life, your child.
Okay, it's a tough one. So let's go with this hypothesis. So was it intentional or unintentional? If it was intentional, then we're going to say she didn't drink as much. She was tossing the alcohol, making it seem like she was drunk to the friend, right? Doing everything she normally does. She knows her husband is working at least until 3, 4 a.m.
And she just doesn't want the burden of the child anymore. Right. So she acts like she's drunk. She puts the kids in bed with her. The kids fall asleep. Then she wakes up, takes her child and either sells the baby or, you know, makes the child go away. Right. That would be one theory.
The accident theory is far harder for me to go over because, listen, we've all been in that half buzz state, you know, where you go to bed drunk and then you wake up half sober. How do you negotiate that? She wakes up. She finds that she smothered her baby. Right? Now I have to get rid of it because I can't face reality. How does she do that within walking distance and have the presence of mind?
Oh, let me take the phones. Let me not be seen. And if my kids wake up, there are so many variables to that theory. It's very hard for me to pursue that one. Far easier for me to go further down the road with she sold a child, which I do not believe.
Absolutely. Those boys were interviewed and they were old enough to know if their baby sister was in the bed with them.
Right? There were just so many different ways. You know that if she did it, she would have gotten caught again. These are simple people. And I don't mean that in a detrimental sense. They're not master criminals. You know, if someone planned this out, they wouldn't be able to do it. Just too many variables.
You know, it was, in my opinion, again, the perfect storm of, you know, Jeremy being away or being over served, the boys being in the bed. For her to roll over on a baby and then get rid of the child, could have done it. But she would have got caught real quick. And then again, just think about the guilt.
This isn't someone that's, you know, a sociopath serial killer that could kill a person, you know, once a week and then go out in life to stay married with your husband, to look at your children in the eyes, to, you know, the pain that she went through, you know, behind the scenes that we've all saw just doesn't play out to me.
To your point, Megan, when Jeremy came home, no one heard him come in. He was walking around the house. He shut the window. He turned out the lights. He went into the bedrooms. Didn't wake them up for him either.
The reason why I think no one has claimed the reward, because it was a sole actor who committed this crime and no one else knows about it. Because to your point, Megan, that's $100,000 and they could do right and they could have done it at that time. Now, was the baby sold or something more nefarious?
Showing 21–31 of 31 · page 2 of 2
← Previous