Bob Burg

It does not consider the good of the other party, and it results in a win-lose situation. Now, in direct contrast to the manipulator, the persuader always seeks to enhance the self-esteem, or I would say the position, of the other party. People respond better because they're treated as responsible, responsable, self-directing individual.

It does not consider the good of the other party, and it results in a win-lose situation. Now, in direct contrast to the manipulator, the persuader always seeks to enhance the self-esteem, or I would say the position, of the other party. People respond better because they're treated as responsible, responsable, self-directing individual.

It does not consider the good of the other party, and it results in a win-lose situation. Now, in direct contrast to the manipulator, the persuader always seeks to enhance the self-esteem, or I would say the position, of the other party. People respond better because they're treated as responsible, responsable, self-directing individual.

It does not consider the good of the other party, and it results in a win-lose situation. Now, in direct contrast to the manipulator, the persuader always seeks to enhance the self-esteem, or I would say the position, of the other party. People respond better because they're treated as responsible, responsable, self-directing individual.

It does not consider the good of the other party, and it results in a win-lose situation. Now, in direct contrast to the manipulator, the persuader always seeks to enhance the self-esteem, or I would say the position, of the other party. People respond better because they're treated as responsible, responsable, self-directing individual.

It does not consider the good of the other party, and it results in a win-lose situation. Now, in direct contrast to the manipulator, the persuader always seeks to enhance the self-esteem, or I would say the position, of the other party. People respond better because they're treated as responsible, responsable, self-directing individual.

It does not consider the good of the other party, and it results in a win-lose situation. Now, in direct contrast to the manipulator, the persuader always seeks to enhance the self-esteem, or I would say the position, of the other party. People respond better because they're treated as responsible, responsable, self-directing individual.

It does not consider the good of the other party, and it results in a win-lose situation. Now, in direct contrast to the manipulator, the persuader always seeks to enhance the self-esteem, or I would say the position, of the other party. People respond better because they're treated as responsible, responsable, self-directing individual.

It does not consider the good of the other party, and it results in a win-lose situation. Now, in direct contrast to the manipulator, the persuader always seeks to enhance the self-esteem, or I would say the position, of the other party. People respond better because they're treated as responsible, responsable, self-directing individual.

It does not consider the good of the other party, and it results in a win-lose situation. Now, in direct contrast to the manipulator, the persuader always seeks to enhance the self-esteem, or I would say the position, of the other party. People respond better because they're treated as responsible, responsable, self-directing individual.

So it begins really with intent, though that's not where it ends. But here's the thing. See, a manipulator may not be trying to necessarily hurt the other person, But if that's what it takes to get their way, they'll do so because it's all about them and their needs.

So it begins really with intent, though that's not where it ends. But here's the thing. See, a manipulator may not be trying to necessarily hurt the other person, But if that's what it takes to get their way, they'll do so because it's all about them and their needs.

So it begins really with intent, though that's not where it ends. But here's the thing. See, a manipulator may not be trying to necessarily hurt the other person, But if that's what it takes to get their way, they'll do so because it's all about them and their needs.

So it begins really with intent, though that's not where it ends. But here's the thing. See, a manipulator may not be trying to necessarily hurt the other person, But if that's what it takes to get their way, they'll do so because it's all about them and their needs.

So it begins really with intent, though that's not where it ends. But here's the thing. See, a manipulator may not be trying to necessarily hurt the other person, But if that's what it takes to get their way, they'll do so because it's all about them and their needs.

So it begins really with intent, though that's not where it ends. But here's the thing. See, a manipulator may not be trying to necessarily hurt the other person, But if that's what it takes to get their way, they'll do so because it's all about them and their needs.

So it begins really with intent, though that's not where it ends. But here's the thing. See, a manipulator may not be trying to necessarily hurt the other person, But if that's what it takes to get their way, they'll do so because it's all about them and their needs.

So it begins really with intent, though that's not where it ends. But here's the thing. See, a manipulator may not be trying to necessarily hurt the other person, But if that's what it takes to get their way, they'll do so because it's all about them and their needs.

So it begins really with intent, though that's not where it ends. But here's the thing. See, a manipulator may not be trying to necessarily hurt the other person, But if that's what it takes to get their way, they'll do so because it's all about them and their needs.

So it begins really with intent, though that's not where it ends. But here's the thing. See, a manipulator may not be trying to necessarily hurt the other person, But if that's what it takes to get their way, they'll do so because it's all about them and their needs.