Brady Holmer

Yeah, I mean, what you said is, it's certainly, I think, reassuring for a lot of people and they should reframe how they think about the activity throughout their day.

Like count a lot of stuff and do things deliberately that you can either gain like a reward from or know that you're just like benefiting your health.

I think it's reassuring to see that those little short bouts have value, not just from the Vilpa studies, but from this study and just from like everything that we've talked about regarding like the mechanisms.

I think my key takeaway was,

This study, I mean, it was one of the most interesting studies I've read in a while.

And that's kind of why I wrote about it.

I wrote about it on my sub stack.

And like we're talking about it today.

It reframed how I think about devices in a way.

And I think it should reframe how a lot of people look at their wearable and the data that it is telling you.

I'm not just not this is obviously to say that you should ignore it.

But I think that you should look at the data from your wearable in a different way and really think about what is it telling you?

Does it?

Are you you know, when you're looking at how many steps you got during the day?

Does that really matter?

Or like, what is the context of those steps?

Or, you know, one, what's your goal?

And then two, you know, what value are those steps giving you?

Because if you're just chasing a number like steps, and

it might kind of be meaningless.