Brandon Aceto

So I don't think we should put him in charge of the entire intelligence agency.

Plus, it's not a job where you're a brief intern in it and you can turn it over to somebody else.

You have to be sworn in and briefed on all the confidential things that are going on.

And what does he know about what's going on in the Middle East or what's going on in Russia?

And with terrorism and this and that, I mean, not that a lot of people who have had that before are super impressive either.

But he's not he hasn't done anything remarkable with the job he already has.

So why are you going to double him up with this now?

Like, is it going to be a Rubio thing where he's holding both these jobs at once?

Like it does create the question of like, oh, does Trump just want somebody there who is a yes man?

So, no, I don't like it.

Tom, what do you say to that?

Right.

I mean, and but the thing is that that job is a labyrinth.

Like think about all like there's not a single person in the world who knows every single thing that's going on in the intelligence agencies.

Right.

Like even if it's the director of the CIA, he doesn't know everything that's going on in the CIA.

So how would he even go about learning everything that's going on and what each person's about?

I mean, I think that's an unrealistic task for him to do if that is the initiative.

A good manager will know.

What do you mean?