Brett M. Kavanaugh

speaker

5,960 appearances 111 recordings 1 series first heard Oct 2024 last heard 29 Apr

Brett M. Kavanaugh’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.

Trend

recordings per month · last 12 months

Recordings per month over the last 12 months — 53 in all, peaking in Mar 2026 with 10.

Appearances

newest first · ▶ plays the moment

Supreme Court of the United States · Trump, President of United States v. Slaughter (25-332) · 8 Dec 2025 court

I thought your two exceptions that um podcast-host

Uh you've had a lot of questions about but I thought the two exceptions, the categories were one, the Federal Reserve, based on history and tradition and function. podcast-host

and the other were the non Article three courts, which starts in Marbury. podcast-host

Marbury itself podcast-host

discusses this. podcast-host

Taft discusses Marbury at length in Myers on this exact point of non Article three courts being different podcast-host

Taft leaves that open, right, in uh uh in Myers. podcast-host

And so for Court of Federal Claims, Tax Court, the DC local courts, you mentioned this at page twenty three of your brief, it would seem to me that Marbury itself says that is a line that distinguishes the non Article three courts from the position that you're taking here. podcast-host

I know you may not agree with that, but is that a principled, sensible line we could draw? podcast-host

I think there's been debate about Marbury, was that a about DC or was that about Judicial Office? podcast-host

But I read it to be a uh some of both, so for what that's worth. podcast-host

Um why did no President challenge this structure from nineteen thirty-five to twenty twenty-five? podcast-host

We have had a lot of presidents who have had very strong views of Article II, yet for ninety years it stood not directly challenged. podcast-host

Why do you think that is? podcast-host

One thing you've said, but I want to make it crystal clear that overruling or narrowing Humphreys executor would not threaten the existence of these agencies, but only would alter how the podcast-host

Heads of those agencies can be removed, correct? podcast-host

The way we have done it is to sever the removal restriction, not to destroy the agency, correct? podcast-host

That's exactly right. podcast-host

Unstar de CISIS. podcast-host

Um podcast-host

Showing 2201–2220 of 5,960 · page 111 of 298