Brett M. Kavanaugh

speaker

21,539 appearances 451 recordings 1 series first heard Jan 2018 last heard 29 Apr

Brett M. Kavanaugh’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.

Trend

recordings per month · last 12 months

Recordings per month over the last 12 months — 53 in all, peaking in Mar 2026 with 10.

Appearances

newest first · ▶ plays the moment

Supreme Court of the United States · Louisiana v. Callais (24-109_2) · 15 Oct 2025 court

And uh goes on to say section two plaintiffs cannot claim a lack of equal openness where politics rather than race is the likely reason for the state's refusal to create a majority minority district. podcast-host

issue as as you know is that this court's cases in a variety of contexts have said that podcast-host

race based remedies are permissible for a period of time, sometimes for a long period of time, decades uh in some cases, but that they should not be podcast-host

uh indefinite and should uh have a end point. podcast-host

And what podcast-host

Exactly do you think the end point should be or how would we know for the intentional use of race to create districts? podcast-host

I'm sorry to interrupt. podcast-host

I don't think it's the statute, it's the particular application of the statute. podcast-host

that entails the intentional deliberate use of race to sort people into different districts. podcast-host

Uh that particular aspect, uh I'm guessing, um podcast-host

I am asking uh what you think the time limit on that should be, or there really shouldn't be a time limit. podcast-host

I I think you might be saying there shouldn't be a time limit unless Congress uh chooses one. podcast-host

Justice podcast-host

Yes, the hang up there is the word discriminate, uh, but your answer is that they can intentionally use race in those circumstances, correct? podcast-host

The Federal District Court. podcast-host

And then I think you said so long as it's not excessive and you mentioned strict scrutiny. podcast-host

as well, correct? podcast-host

Correct. podcast-host

But part of st scrutiny again is the temporal limit that's been part of s strict scrutiny for a long time. podcast-host

And I think your answers earlier to that to me and when you were talking with Justice Jackson were, well, Congress defer to Congress, but when we're applying the Equal Protection Clause, or as Justice Barrett said, the Fifteenth Amendment uh congruent in proportionality or Fourteenth Amendment. podcast-host

Showing 2901–2920 of 21,539 · page 146 of 1077