Brian Buckmeyer
đ€ SpeakerAppearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
So let's say EJ and I, EJ, we're partners in crime now, we go and steal a million dollars, right? In order for us to steal a million dollars, we must have obviously stolen a thousand dollars. And so if the government catches us and they charge us with this crime, they would charge us with both grand larceny in the first degree and petit larceny. And of course all the larcenies in between.
So let's say EJ and I, EJ, we're partners in crime now, we go and steal a million dollars, right? In order for us to steal a million dollars, we must have obviously stolen a thousand dollars. And so if the government catches us and they charge us with this crime, they would charge us with both grand larceny in the first degree and petit larceny. And of course all the larcenies in between.
Because the petit larceny would be a lesser included crime of the grand larceny. Because in order to commit grand larceny, you have to commit petit larceny. But the reason why I don't think that's going to happen here in these charges is because there are no lesser included crimes to RICO. There are no lesser included crimes to sex trafficking.
Because the petit larceny would be a lesser included crime of the grand larceny. Because in order to commit grand larceny, you have to commit petit larceny. But the reason why I don't think that's going to happen here in these charges is because there are no lesser included crimes to RICO. There are no lesser included crimes to sex trafficking.
There are no lesser included crimes to transportation to engage in prostitution. Those are just the crimes. You can't do something... Like less of transportation. You can't like get someone just up to the state line and then not bring them over to the state line and be like, well, it's a lesser included to transportation to engage in prostitution. Some crimes have lesser included. Some don't.
There are no lesser included crimes to transportation to engage in prostitution. Those are just the crimes. You can't do something... Like less of transportation. You can't like get someone just up to the state line and then not bring them over to the state line and be like, well, it's a lesser included to transportation to engage in prostitution. Some crimes have lesser included. Some don't.
The one that Sean Combs is facing doesn't appear to have them. But great question. Thank you so much. Um zurĂŒckzukehren zu einer Hörerfrage von ein paar Episoden zuvor, fragte ein Hörer, ob PrĂ€sident Trump Sean Combs verurteilen könnte. Die Antwort war ja. Das ist ein föderaler Fall. Der PrĂ€sident hat diese Macht.
The one that Sean Combs is facing doesn't appear to have them. But great question. Thank you so much. Um zurĂŒckzukehren zu einer Hörerfrage von ein paar Episoden zuvor, fragte ein Hörer, ob PrĂ€sident Trump Sean Combs verurteilen könnte. Die Antwort war ja. Das ist ein föderaler Fall. Der PrĂ€sident hat diese Macht.
Zu dem Zeitpunkt haben wir ABCs politische Team mit dem White House gesucht, um zu sehen, was sie ĂŒber die Möglichkeit eines Verurteilens finden könnten. Sie haben mit einer Anwesenden gesprochen, die sagte, dass ein Entschuldigung fĂŒr Diddy nicht vorgesehen war. Aber wir haben ein Update. PrĂ€sident Trump wurde letzten Freitag gefragt, ob er ein Entschuldigung fĂŒr Diddy vorgesehen hĂ€tte.
Zu dem Zeitpunkt haben wir ABCs politische Team mit dem White House gesucht, um zu sehen, was sie ĂŒber die Möglichkeit eines Verurteilens finden könnten. Sie haben mit einer Anwesenden gesprochen, die sagte, dass ein Entschuldigung fĂŒr Diddy nicht vorgesehen war. Aber wir haben ein Update. PrĂ€sident Trump wurde letzten Freitag gefragt, ob er ein Entschuldigung fĂŒr Diddy vorgesehen hĂ€tte.
Der PrĂ€sident hat seine Bemerkungen aufgerĂ€umt, um einen Entschuldigung fĂŒr Sean Combs nicht aus der Frage zu stellen.
Der PrĂ€sident hat seine Bemerkungen aufgerĂ€umt, um einen Entschuldigung fĂŒr Sean Combs nicht aus der Frage zu stellen.
Und in einem anderen interessanten Entwicklung auĂerhalb des GerĂ€ts haben unsere ABC-Kollegen ein Interview ĂŒber den Wochenende mit einem der Dittys langjĂ€hrigen Rivalen bekommen, deren Name in den Trial bis jetzt mindestens 50-mal aufgewachsen ist. Marion Shug Knight, who once led Death Row Records, was viewed by many as Sean Combs' chief competitor when he was at his peak in the hip-hop world.
Und in einem anderen interessanten Entwicklung auĂerhalb des GerĂ€ts haben unsere ABC-Kollegen ein Interview ĂŒber den Wochenende mit einem der Dittys langjĂ€hrigen Rivalen bekommen, deren Name in den Trial bis jetzt mindestens 50-mal aufgewachsen ist. Marion Shug Knight, who once led Death Row Records, was viewed by many as Sean Combs' chief competitor when he was at his peak in the hip-hop world.
Knight is currently serving a 28-year sentence for voluntary manslaughter, stemming from a 2015 fatal hit-and-run that's not connected to Combs' case.
Knight is currently serving a 28-year sentence for voluntary manslaughter, stemming from a 2015 fatal hit-and-run that's not connected to Combs' case.
In a series of phone interviews from prison Saturday, Shug described what he alleges was a toxic culture of abuse in parts of the hip-hop industry that he said certainly did not start with Combs.
In a series of phone interviews from prison Saturday, Shug described what he alleges was a toxic culture of abuse in parts of the hip-hop industry that he said certainly did not start with Combs.
But Shug doesn't think Combs should spend the rest of his life in prison.
But Shug doesn't think Combs should spend the rest of his life in prison.