Brian L. Cox

speaker

124 appearances 1 recordings 1 series first heard Dec 2025 last heard 2 Dec

Brian L. Cox’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.

Trend

recordings per month · last 12 months

Recordings per month over the last 12 months — 1 in all, peaking in Dec 2025 with 1.

Appearances

newest first · ▶ plays the moment

The Megyn Kelly Show · "Second Strike" Narrative Falls Apart, Kash Patel Responds, and How To Be a Man, with Rich Lowry, Charles Cooke, Elliot Ackerman, and Bryan Cox | Ep. 1204 · 2 Dec 2025 podcast

And they said, kill them anyways.

I mean, if that's the evidence that we're getting, then, I mean, that sounds to me like a war crime, right?

But we're not getting that evidence from the initial Washington Post report.

And so it's irresponsible to take – to make conclusions, really assertive conclusions that this was a war crime and that Pete Hegseth needs to resign or be fired or prosecuted or whatever based on –

Yeah, we don't need to be, we, so, you know, having spent 22 years in the military, I'm just still kind of part of my identity.

And so I still identify in that even though I'm no longer in, but, you know, service members, me included when I was in, we don't need reminders that we, you know, have to, we have an obligation not to obey manifestly unlawful orders, right?

So not just unlawful orders, but manifestly.

We don't need anyone from Congress.

We don't need anyone from the outside to remind us of this because, I mean, it's part of the ethos that we live every day.

It's drilled into us, you know, starting in basic training.

And it's part of our following orders is it's part of the military life.

I mean, it's part of good order and discipline.

But we're also we already understand that we have no obligation to follow orders.

patent, you know, manifestly unlawful orders.

And so, the people who are reminding us or reminding the, you know, members of the DoD of this, they know that.

They know that service members don't need to be reminded that we have no obligation to follow manifestly unlawful orders.

They're doing this to create doubt, to second guess the current political leadership of the military, civilian and senior military leadership, to create the appearance that the orders that are being given are manifestly unlawful, and so there is an obligation.

And not to follow them.

And that is also irresponsible because, again, it's not something we need to be reminded of.

And the obligation is not just to not follow or not obey unlawful orders, but it's manifestly unlawful.

Showing 81–100 of 124 · page 5 of 7