Brittany Luce

And so what we need is to cut through all of the noise with a stronger signal.

We need to build a tool that will allow people in this market to signal their strongest preference in order to make this market more efficient.

I think that's what's happening from kind of an economic perspective.

I think that, you know, to address the kind of inhumanity or the dehumanizing factor that Nitish talked about, it's because, you know, we just keep falling back on technology to be like, well, this problem kind of came out of technology, so we'll just...

put in more technology to try to fix it.

And, you know, maybe that gets us stuck in a little bit of a doom loop, to borrow a term that you threw out previously, because maybe the fix is actually something that doesn't have to do with technology.

I don't know what it could be, but clearly the technology is not making people happy either.

Now that we're talking about this, I'm thinking about it some more.

This technology was meant to solve a problem and it kind of, in both cases, it seems like it's kind of like broken both of these processes down.

I'll say.

you need to be able to pay bills to live, right?

Having companionship is amazing.

I'm married.

I adore my husband.

I'm obsessed with him.

I found him on the apps.

But like, if the apps didn't exist, I could go out to my local bar and chat with somebody and eventually get a date.

You can swear off the apps and still get some motion.

You cannot be like, I'm getting off of LinkedIn.

For most people, for most workers, they can't, whatever the employment site is, it's very difficult to,