Buck Sexton

Apparently they have a huge following, which is amazing to me.

Oh, absolutely. I think, look, it's funny because they asked if I would go on Fox this afternoon, Clay, and they have a former Obama guy who we're going to have some debate or something. I mean, it'll be three minutes long. We'll both get to talk one and a half times probably, but I'll make my points. I'll make his points.

Oh, absolutely. I think, look, it's funny because they asked if I would go on Fox this afternoon, Clay, and they have a former Obama guy who we're going to have some debate or something. I mean, it'll be three minutes long. We'll both get to talk one and a half times probably, but I'll make my points. I'll make his points.

Oh, absolutely. I think, look, it's funny because they asked if I would go on Fox this afternoon, Clay, and they have a former Obama guy who we're going to have some debate or something. I mean, it'll be three minutes long. We'll both get to talk one and a half times probably, but I'll make my points. I'll make his points.

It's interesting, though, because Fox News for a while was, as you know, frozen out by Democrats. They refused to go on. Really, generally, the only Democrats who would go on were clay pigeons. They were there to get blown to smithereens on air and, you know, for the amusement of the audience. And I think that that's changing now because they have to they have to just switch things up.

It's interesting, though, because Fox News for a while was, as you know, frozen out by Democrats. They refused to go on. Really, generally, the only Democrats who would go on were clay pigeons. They were there to get blown to smithereens on air and, you know, for the amusement of the audience. And I think that that's changing now because they have to they have to just switch things up.

It's interesting, though, because Fox News for a while was, as you know, frozen out by Democrats. They refused to go on. Really, generally, the only Democrats who would go on were clay pigeons. They were there to get blown to smithereens on air and, you know, for the amusement of the audience. And I think that that's changing now because they have to they have to just switch things up.

They can't continue on with the current trajectory because it's not only that their party lost. It's that they don't have the same control of the information ecosystem that they used to. So they can't just rely on the New York Times, CNN axis of evil to propagate all kinds of nonsense all over the country because people aren't watching and people don't care.

They can't continue on with the current trajectory because it's not only that their party lost. It's that they don't have the same control of the information ecosystem that they used to. So they can't just rely on the New York Times, CNN axis of evil to propagate all kinds of nonsense all over the country because people aren't watching and people don't care.

They can't continue on with the current trajectory because it's not only that their party lost. It's that they don't have the same control of the information ecosystem that they used to. So they can't just rely on the New York Times, CNN axis of evil to propagate all kinds of nonsense all over the country because people aren't watching and people don't care.

They don't have the same gravitas that they even were managing, I think, up until this election. So you're going to see more Democrats crossing over into unfriendly media because they have to, which will expose them, by the way, because most of them are actually not up to the task and not up to the challenge of making their arguments. Tim Walz certainly isn't.

They don't have the same gravitas that they even were managing, I think, up until this election. So you're going to see more Democrats crossing over into unfriendly media because they have to, which will expose them, by the way, because most of them are actually not up to the task and not up to the challenge of making their arguments. Tim Walz certainly isn't.

They don't have the same gravitas that they even were managing, I think, up until this election. So you're going to see more Democrats crossing over into unfriendly media because they have to, which will expose them, by the way, because most of them are actually not up to the task and not up to the challenge of making their arguments. Tim Walz certainly isn't.

I mean, Tim Walz got so schooled by J.D. Vance in the debate, I almost started to feel kind of bad for him. But then I remind myself that he had a snitch line over COVID. I'm like, nope, nope, he deserves it. But the Democrats don't have anybody right now who I think is particularly adept in that form of presentation and exchange of ideas on the political side.

I mean, Tim Walz got so schooled by J.D. Vance in the debate, I almost started to feel kind of bad for him. But then I remind myself that he had a snitch line over COVID. I'm like, nope, nope, he deserves it. But the Democrats don't have anybody right now who I think is particularly adept in that form of presentation and exchange of ideas on the political side.

I mean, Tim Walz got so schooled by J.D. Vance in the debate, I almost started to feel kind of bad for him. But then I remind myself that he had a snitch line over COVID. I'm like, nope, nope, he deserves it. But the Democrats don't have anybody right now who I think is particularly adept in that form of presentation and exchange of ideas on the political side.

I don't think they have a particularly strong team on the media side either right now. I sit here and I keep looking for worthy adversaries on the left. And all I see are people who insist on pretending that men don't actually have an advantage over women in sports, et cetera, et cetera. It's sad out there right now for the Democrats, which is why Trump's got to hit the accelerator and keep going.

I don't think they have a particularly strong team on the media side either right now. I sit here and I keep looking for worthy adversaries on the left. And all I see are people who insist on pretending that men don't actually have an advantage over women in sports, et cetera, et cetera. It's sad out there right now for the Democrats, which is why Trump's got to hit the accelerator and keep going.

I don't think they have a particularly strong team on the media side either right now. I sit here and I keep looking for worthy adversaries on the left. And all I see are people who insist on pretending that men don't actually have an advantage over women in sports, et cetera, et cetera. It's sad out there right now for the Democrats, which is why Trump's got to hit the accelerator and keep going.

The big goal here, because I think that there has been a sense that the best that Trump is going to have for a wide open field is the next 18 months, which I believe is likely to be the case. People are starting to talk about 60 Senate seats now. I know. And that's now you're talking about anything the Republicans really want to get done. They'd be in a position to do if they got 60 Senate seats.