C. Thi Nguyen

Yeah.

And even if it's a funny light experience, the claim is something like, no, it's going to steer you towards kind of the average funny light experience and not like the weird, peculiar funniness that you'll find.

And then there's a bigger point that I think we should shell for a bit and come back to, which is like being worried that you won't

develop your own sensibility, right?

That you're giving up some profound independence.

So let me, I'm just going to give names to this because I don't want to forget either because I think these are the two, these are the things I want to talk to you two the most.

The first one I'm going to, let's call portability.

The second one is the value capture stuff that I've been thinking about.

So let me, let me, let me go, let me, let me, let's do portability first.

So here's, let me give you the kind of like stepped back,

philosophical answer to what you're talking about.

So...

So you say, and I suspect you're just teeing me up to say this, so thank you.

You say, look, shouldn't we just make better metrics, right?

Is this a problem of a particular, of this particular metric?

Couldn't we just improve them?

It's true that one of the things I've said is something like, oh, it's, you could shift from like the rotten tomatoes metric to like thinking about the agreement of the critics on the long term, something like that.

But I think, I think that's not going to do it.

You could do better, but not perfectly and not, especially not in this case, because of the nature of,

what data is and how data is collected insofar as metrics are based on data.