Casey Liss
๐ค SpeakerAppearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
Maybe they'll reverse it in 15.2.
Maybe they'll reverse it in 15.2.
Did it give you the option to charge anyway, like this feedback said?
Did it give you the option to charge anyway, like this feedback said?
Well, anyway, look for this coming soon to a Mac near you, maybe. Yeah, exactly. I mean, I think it's a good idea. Like, if they have these liquid detectors and they can detect that there's liquid in the port, saying, hey, I know you just plugged it in, but I'm choosing not to charge because I've detected liquid. And again, maybe not with an option to override, but...
Well, anyway, look for this coming soon to a Mac near you, maybe. Yeah, exactly. I mean, I think it's a good idea. Like, if they have these liquid detectors and they can detect that there's liquid in the port, saying, hey, I know you just plugged it in, but I'm choosing not to charge because I've detected liquid. And again, maybe not with an option to override, but...
It may be in really humid places. They get that every time they plug in. But yeah, it's good for macOS to get those features as well because anybody who's got a USB-C port, there could be water in there. Yep.
It may be in really humid places. They get that every time they plug in. But yeah, it's good for macOS to get those features as well because anybody who's got a USB-C port, there could be water in there. Yep.
This is such a incredibly harsh judgment in a situation where Google was already way more open than Apple, and yet the jury decided, you may claim that you're open, but you've constructed all these deals and all these incentives that you really aren't open. So A, you're a monopoly, and B, the stuff you're doing impairs competition.
This is such a incredibly harsh judgment in a situation where Google was already way more open than Apple, and yet the jury decided, you may claim that you're open, but you've constructed all these deals and all these incentives that you really aren't open. So A, you're a monopoly, and B, the stuff you're doing impairs competition.
i don't think this bodes well for apple we'll see different cases sometimes uh google has gotten worse judgments because they like were claiming that they were open but they weren't whereas apple never claims that they are they're just like it's totally closed but like oh you know it's it's so hard for third-party apps to get going you know how it makes it really hard for third-party apps to go and completely never allowing them at all in any possible way like apple had been doing right
i don't think this bodes well for apple we'll see different cases sometimes uh google has gotten worse judgments because they like were claiming that they were open but they weren't whereas apple never claims that they are they're just like it's totally closed but like oh you know it's it's so hard for third-party apps to get going you know how it makes it really hard for third-party apps to go and completely never allowing them at all in any possible way like apple had been doing right
But look at this. They have to distribute the third party. It's as if the Epic Store had to be in the App Store, and it automatically got access to every app in the App Store unless the developer opted out. Can you imagine this judgment going against Apple? Again, with the caveat, appeals, blah, blah, blah. Who knows how this will end up? But wow, this is like...
But look at this. They have to distribute the third party. It's as if the Epic Store had to be in the App Store, and it automatically got access to every app in the App Store unless the developer opted out. Can you imagine this judgment going against Apple? Again, with the caveat, appeals, blah, blah, blah. Who knows how this will end up? But wow, this is like...
the doomsday scenario for judgments on app stores it's all of apple's worst nightmares come true and all epic streams come true uh with the exception of the security policing thing which obviously they'll they'll argue about because like if you give if you give a company like google any kind of lever any kind of oversight or input into this process google will decide how they can use it to try to get back the control that they're getting taken away by this but
the doomsday scenario for judgments on app stores it's all of apple's worst nightmares come true and all epic streams come true uh with the exception of the security policing thing which obviously they'll they'll argue about because like if you give if you give a company like google any kind of lever any kind of oversight or input into this process google will decide how they can use it to try to get back the control that they're getting taken away by this but
Man, this is this is in the US. So this is not DMA. This is not the EU. This was the case we've talked about before. Google was found to have a monopoly. How are they going to fix it? They're going to fix it by saying, yeah, Google, all that stuff you were doing. You're not doing that anymore for three years. I don't know why three years like when three years is over.
Man, this is this is in the US. So this is not DMA. This is not the EU. This was the case we've talked about before. Google was found to have a monopoly. How are they going to fix it? They're going to fix it by saying, yeah, Google, all that stuff you were doing. You're not doing that anymore for three years. I don't know why three years like when three years is over.
Did this go back to the old way? This is slightly confusing. remedy but boy this is i was about to say this is epic but i'm not going to do that this is extremely harsh google cannot be happy and i guess apple's over there thinking well boy i'm glad that will never happen to us because we're so different than google
Did this go back to the old way? This is slightly confusing. remedy but boy this is i was about to say this is epic but i'm not going to do that this is extremely harsh google cannot be happy and i guess apple's over there thinking well boy i'm glad that will never happen to us because we're so different than google