Charles Coleman
speaker
4,277 appearances
31 recordings
1 series
first heard Jul 2025
last heard 4d ago
Charles Coleman’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.
Trend
recordings per month · last 12 monthsRecordings per month over the last 12 months — 25 in all, peaking in Aug 2026 with 5.
Appearances
The Don Lemon Show · Nolan Wells' Family Left In The Dark During Investigation · 15 Jul 2026
podcast
But I need people to understand the other side to how this works.
Because God forbid that we were to change the color of the victim and who we suspect, we would also want transparency of the process.
That's the other part that people aren't necessarily considering, that adhering to the process must allow us to make the process work both ways, both for victim and for offender.
And so Lee talked about the idea that if it were the other way around, that we would likely see an aggressive rush to an arrest.
Well, the importance of transparency in the process is that if that ever were to be the case, that we have precedent that we can point to and demand the same type of transparency and thoroughness in terms of the process before that aggressive type of decision is made.
And so looking at this.
appreciating the severity and the impact that it may have on Nolan Wells and his family, but also looking at the bigger picture and the implication that it could have for other black boys, both as victims potentially and as suspects, requires that we really do put our foot down and demand a transparent process that has integrity.
Yeah, Don, you know, today is a day that I think people need to look at in terms of not red and blue, not Democrat or Republican, but understanding fundamentally what this means around American democracy.
And the reason I say that is because
You had half of the judges who were looking at the intention of clearly defining powers of branches of government and giving more power to the executive branch.
And then you had the other justices who were thinking about the impact that these decisions were going to have.
So Sonia Sotomayor, for example, was talking about the impact, understanding that regardless of whether you make this facially neutral in terms of the powers that you're giving to the president,
The impact that it is going to have in this particular moment is going to affect human life.
People are going to die.
And our viewers need to understand that at least on the surface, the six justices, particularly with respect to the TPS case, their reasoning was allegedly, allegedly wrong.
not based on what countries were going to be immediately affected, but rather the amount of power that they were going to allow the executive branch to have in terms of setting immigration policy.
They limited judicial review or basically removed judicial review over TPS as a process, even as proponents of review had argued, hey, we're not even saying that you should have a say in the courts over what the decisions are, but at least the court should have a say or a review over the process that the government is using in terms of when and where they grant TPS.
And the court said, no, they have no place in those decisions whatsoever.
Now that's an intention thing from a power place to give power to the presidency.
But the three liberal justices,
Showing 1241–1260 of 4,277 · page 63 of 214
← Previous
Next →