Chris Josephs

Yes. Yeah. So, this is where it gets complex. And I'd be curious to hear your take on this. So... There's bills out there to get it banned. I think social media has done a tremendous job with this, with the Pelosi tracker, with all of us trying to call out with our app. Part of it is built to highlight the hypocrisy of just how big of a problem this is. $500 million shouldn't be copying Pelosi.

Yes. Yeah. So, this is where it gets complex. And I'd be curious to hear your take on this. So... There's bills out there to get it banned. I think social media has done a tremendous job with this, with the Pelosi tracker, with all of us trying to call out with our app. Part of it is built to highlight the hypocrisy of just how big of a problem this is. $500 million shouldn't be copying Pelosi.

Yes. Yeah. So, this is where it gets complex. And I'd be curious to hear your take on this. So... There's bills out there to get it banned. I think social media has done a tremendous job with this, with the Pelosi tracker, with all of us trying to call out with our app. Part of it is built to highlight the hypocrisy of just how big of a problem this is. $500 million shouldn't be copying Pelosi.

If they are, that's a problem. So to credit to some of these politicians, AOC has done a lot. She's a fiery figure, but she has had two bills. She actually just released a bill a week ago called the Restore Faith in Government Act, and it calls for banning political stock trading. There's been around five bills. It's good for her. Yeah. She had a bill with Matt Gaetz. Yeah. Yeah.

If they are, that's a problem. So to credit to some of these politicians, AOC has done a lot. She's a fiery figure, but she has had two bills. She actually just released a bill a week ago called the Restore Faith in Government Act, and it calls for banning political stock trading. There's been around five bills. It's good for her. Yeah. She had a bill with Matt Gaetz. Yeah. Yeah.

If they are, that's a problem. So to credit to some of these politicians, AOC has done a lot. She's a fiery figure, but she has had two bills. She actually just released a bill a week ago called the Restore Faith in Government Act, and it calls for banning political stock trading. There's been around five bills. It's good for her. Yeah. She had a bill with Matt Gaetz. Yeah. Yeah.

The bill that's got the farthest, and this is where this just frustrates me with all the stuff going on, is there was a bill introduced by Josh Howley, John Ossoff, and a couple other politicians. The reason why that one's important is because they got that to the Senate.

The bill that's got the farthest, and this is where this just frustrates me with all the stuff going on, is there was a bill introduced by Josh Howley, John Ossoff, and a couple other politicians. The reason why that one's important is because they got that to the Senate.

The bill that's got the farthest, and this is where this just frustrates me with all the stuff going on, is there was a bill introduced by Josh Howley, John Ossoff, and a couple other politicians. The reason why that one's important is because they got that to the Senate.

And in the Senate, while they were in one of the committees, the way that the bills enter the floor is they have to get passed off by the committee. This is the bill that made it the farthest. In that bill, though, they offered kind of four things. First, members can't trade stocks by 2025. This was introduced in 2024. Members can't trade stocks.

And in the Senate, while they were in one of the committees, the way that the bills enter the floor is they have to get passed off by the committee. This is the bill that made it the farthest. In that bill, though, they offered kind of four things. First, members can't trade stocks by 2025. This was introduced in 2024. Members can't trade stocks.

And in the Senate, while they were in one of the committees, the way that the bills enter the floor is they have to get passed off by the committee. This is the bill that made it the farthest. In that bill, though, they offered kind of four things. First, members can't trade stocks by 2025. This was introduced in 2024. Members can't trade stocks.

Second, spouses and dependents can't trade stocks through 2027. Third, any private investment you have, you have to sell out of to run, to become a politician. No one has ever asked for that. That has never come up and that became a big, big problem. This is where it gets scary and we have to be careful with what we're essentially pushing for.

Second, spouses and dependents can't trade stocks through 2027. Third, any private investment you have, you have to sell out of to run, to become a politician. No one has ever asked for that. That has never come up and that became a big, big problem. This is where it gets scary and we have to be careful with what we're essentially pushing for.

Second, spouses and dependents can't trade stocks through 2027. Third, any private investment you have, you have to sell out of to run, to become a politician. No one has ever asked for that. That has never come up and that became a big, big problem. This is where it gets scary and we have to be careful with what we're essentially pushing for.

So what everyone has asked for on these bills is no trading, No members and their spouses can trade, put it in a blind trust. Now this fourth bill, no trading, no members and spouse, blind trust, but also you have to sell out of every private investment. And that, when they started debating it, Mitt Romney, Tim Scott, and a couple other politicians on it were like, wait a second.

So what everyone has asked for on these bills is no trading, No members and their spouses can trade, put it in a blind trust. Now this fourth bill, no trading, no members and spouse, blind trust, but also you have to sell out of every private investment. And that, when they started debating it, Mitt Romney, Tim Scott, and a couple other politicians on it were like, wait a second.

So what everyone has asked for on these bills is no trading, No members and their spouses can trade, put it in a blind trust. Now this fourth bill, no trading, no members and spouse, blind trust, but also you have to sell out of every private investment. And that, when they started debating it, Mitt Romney, Tim Scott, and a couple other politicians on it were like, wait a second.

We can't vote yes on this. If you guys are telling me that any future politician that wants to run has to sell out of private investments, that could become a major, major problem. If you want to run and be a politician, you'd have to sell out of your businesses. If I were to run, I would have to sell out of my businesses. A farmer would have to sell out of his family businesses. Is that right?

We can't vote yes on this. If you guys are telling me that any future politician that wants to run has to sell out of private investments, that could become a major, major problem. If you want to run and be a politician, you'd have to sell out of your businesses. If I were to run, I would have to sell out of my businesses. A farmer would have to sell out of his family businesses. Is that right?